a1qa vs QAwerk
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
Field by field
| Field | a1qa | QAwerk |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Decatur, the USA | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Delivery locations | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico | Ukraine |
| Team size | 1000 or more people | 51-200 people |
| Founded | 2003 | 2015 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Services | Manual testing, Test automation, Performance testing, Security testing, Accessibility testing, Compatibility testing, API testing, Localization testing, Usability testing, Acceptance testing, QA consulting | Mobile app testing, Penetration testing, AR/VR testing, Accessibility testing, Manual testing, Blockchain testing, Localization testing, Compliance testing, AI system testing, Compatibility testing, Test automation, API testing, Usability testing, Security testing, Acceptance testing, Performance testing |
| Industries | Banking, Telecom, Media, Travel, Ecommerce, Insurance, Healthcare, Games, Education | Games, Automotive, SaaS, Fintech, Ecommerce, Education, Healthcare |
| Frameworks | Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Apache JMeter, Postman, Cucumber, k6, REST Assured, TestComplete, Katalon, SoapUI | Selenium, Robot Framework, Appium, TestNG, JUnit |
| Engagement models | Staff augmentation, Dedicated team, Managed testing service, Project work | Project work, Dedicated team |
| Client stages | Enterprises | Startups |
| Certificates | No certificate confirmed by a register entry | No certificate confirmed by a register entry |
| Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA | Not confirmed / Not confirmed | Not confirmed / Not confirmed |
| Published rates |
|
|
| Minimum project | $10,000clutch.co | $10,000clutch.co |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published |
| Crowd tester pool | Not published | Not published |
| Device lab | Not published | Not published |
Who each one fits
a1qa suits a buyer running a program that spans several countries at once. Its delivery locations reach past its US headquarters into the EU, the UK, and Latin America, fitting a team that wants a shared vendor across regions instead of separate local providers. Its service list stays inside the conventional QA disciplines, so a buyer whose scope fits inside standard test types gets a vendor already covering that ground.
QAwerk suits a buyer already narrowing toward a specialized category rather than a general testing program. Its published scope reaches past the conventional disciplines into territory a1qa's list does not cover, including hardware-facing work such as AR and VR. A team whose project already sits in that territory gets a vendor whose published scope names the work rather than staffing it as an exception.
That specialization raises a question the catalog cannot settle on its own: no device lab is recorded for either company, so hands-on hardware coverage for mobile or AR/VR work stays unconfirmed. A buyer weighing QAwerk for that kind of engagement should ask on the first call how device coverage is sourced, then check the answer against the device lab field on QAwerk's profile.
A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.
QAwerk
Both meet the conditions for Embedded team model, Automation first, Nearshore for the EU, so those conditions do not separate them.
Where the data runs out
Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 86% for a1qa and 86% for QAwerk. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.
Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding, Crowd tester pool, Device lab. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.
Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the a1qa profile and the QAwerk profile.
Questions
- Does either a1qa or QAwerk publish a verified security certificate such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
- Neither a1qa nor QAwerk lists a verified certificate in its catalog profile. A compliance-driven buyer cannot confirm ISO 27001, SOC 2, or any other standard from either profile alone. Any certificate claim raised in a sales call should be checked against a certificate number or a registry entry before it is treated as confirmed.
- How does the published team size compare between a1qa and QAwerk for a buyer that needs surge capacity across several concurrent projects?
- a1qa's profile lists a team size of 1,000 or more people, checked 2 September 2026. QAwerk's profile lists a team size of 51 to 200 people, checked the same date. A buyer expecting to run several projects at once and occasionally pull in extra testers on short notice draws on a larger published headcount at a1qa, while a buyer running one steady project has less reason to weigh that gap. Either way, the published band covers the whole company, not the count of people actually free for a new account.
Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.