Abstracta vs QualityLogic
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
Field by field
| Field | Abstracta | QualityLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, the USA | Boise, the USA |
| Delivery locations | the USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK | the USA |
| Team size | 51-200 people | 51-200 people |
| Founded | 2008 | 1986 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Services | Manual testing, Test automation, Performance testing, Security testing, Accessibility testing, Mobile app testing, QA consulting | Accessibility testing, Manual testing, Test automation, Usability testing, Performance testing, API testing |
| Industries | Banking, Public sector, Healthcare, Ecommerce, Education, Travel | Energy and utilities, Telecom, Ecommerce, Media, Education, Healthcare, Fintech |
| Frameworks | Appium, Gatling | Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Katalon, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Playwright |
| Engagement modelspublished by one of the two | Not published | Staff augmentation, Managed testing service |
| Client stages | Enterprises | Startups, Enterprises |
| Certificates | No certificate confirmed by a register entry | No certificate confirmed by a register entry |
| Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA | Not confirmed / Not confirmed | Not confirmed / Not confirmed |
| Published rates |
|
|
| Minimum projectpublished by one of the two | Not published | $5,000clutch.co |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published |
| Crowd tester pool | Not published | Not published |
| Device labpublished by one of the two | Not published | 400 real devicesqualitylogic.com |
Who each one fits
A team preparing to validate a customer-facing mobile app across many phone and tablet models is the buyer this pair addresses. A vendor's profile carries a device lab as a distinct part of its mobile testing service; the other's profile does not list one. An unlisted field means the catalog found no published inventory to record; it does not mean testing runs on emulators alone. That gap changes what a first call needs to settle before a mobile scope gets priced. Ask each vendor what actually runs the mobile test passes: an owned bench of physical devices, a rented cloud device grid, emulators, or hardware supplied by the client's own team. Ask which operating system versions and screen sizes the answer covers, since a bench built for current flagship phones can still miss the older Android builds a support policy still promises to serve. The published Device lab field on each profile is where that answer gets checked against something written down instead of something said on a call, and reading it afterward tests the claim against the source rather than against memory.
A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.
Abstracta
QualityLogic
Both meet the conditions for Automation first, Performance engineering, so those conditions do not separate them.
Where the data runs out
Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 79% for Abstracta and 86% for QualityLogic. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.
Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding, Crowd tester pool. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.
Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the Abstracta profile and the QualityLogic profile.
Questions
- How many real devices are in the device lab QualityLogic publishes, and what does Abstracta report for the same field?
- QualityLogic's mobile testing page lists a device lab of 400 real devices, checked 2 September 2026. Abstracta's profile carries no device lab entry, so the catalog records no comparable count for it. A buyer testing against a specific handset or OS build checks that published list rather than the headline count, since a lab sized in devices does not say which models it holds.
- How many automation frameworks does each company list, and which single framework appears on both profiles?
- Abstracta's profile lists two automation frameworks, Appium and Gatling, checked 2 September 2026. QualityLogic's profile lists nine automation frameworks, checked 2 September 2026, among them Selenium, Cypress and Playwright. Appium is the only framework named on both profiles. A team standardized on a browser-only framework such as Cypress or Playwright finds it named only on QualityLogic's list.
Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.