QA Rating

Applause vs Berezha Security Group

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

Applause meets the conditions for Crowdtesting at scale; Berezha Security Group meets none that Applause does not. The catalog has Engagement models, Client stages, Crowd tester pool only for Applause, and Published rates, Minimum project only for Berezha Security Group. Neither publishes Frameworks, Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding, Device lab, so the table cannot answer those.

Field by field

Applause and Berezha Security Group compared on the fields published for every company in this catalog
FieldApplauseBerezha Security Group
HeadquartersFramingham, the USAKyiv, Ukraine
Delivery locationsthe USA, Germany, Israel, Poland, IndiaUkraine, Poland
Team size201-500 people11-50 people
Founded20072014
OwnershipSubsidiaryIndependent
ServicesManual testing, Test automation, Payment flow testing, Accessibility testing, Usability testing, Localization testing, Security testing, Mobile app testing, IoT and device testing, AR/VR testingPenetration testing, Security testing, Secure code review, Red teaming
IndustriesAutomotive, Ecommerce, Media, Banking, Travel, Healthcare, Games, TelecomFintech, Banking, Ecommerce, Healthcare, Telecom, Games, SaaS
FrameworksNot publishedNot published
Engagement modelspublished by one of the twoCrowdtesting, Managed testing serviceNot published
Client stagespublished by one of the twoEnterprisesNot published
CertificatesNo certificate confirmed by a register entryNo certificate confirmed by a register entry
Signs a BAA / GDPR DPANot confirmed / Not confirmedNot confirmed / Not confirmed
Published ratespublished by one of the twoNot published
Minimum projectpublished by one of the twoNot published$5,000clutch.co
OnboardingNot publishedNot published
Crowd tester poolpublished by one of the two1,500,000applause.comNot published
Device labNot publishedNot published

Who each one fits

Applause fits a buyer whose engagement is crowdtesting run at enterprise scale, drawing on a published on-demand tester pool spread across devices and locales. Berezha Security Group fits a buyer whose scope is a focused security assessment, carried out by a narrower practice based in Ukraine and Poland.

Certificates sit open on each profile: no named credential such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2 appears on either side of this pair, so a buyer who needs a credential for its own compliance file cannot settle the question from the table. The first-call ask, regardless of which vendor gets picked, is a current audit report or a certificate number.

Published rates work the opposite way: the field carries a stated hourly figure on the narrower security-practice side and nothing on the broader crowdtesting side. A buyer weighing cost across the pair should ask the silent side for a quote before comparing, since a fixed-fee security engagement and an enterprise crowdtesting contract are priced on different bases to begin with.

A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.

Berezha Security Group

Berezha Security Group meets no applicability condition in this catalog. That is a statement about what its published fields show, not about the company.

Both meet the conditions for Nearshore for the EU, so those conditions do not separate them.

Where the data runs out

Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 71% for Applause and 57% for Berezha Security Group. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.

Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Frameworks, Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding, Device lab. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.

Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the Applause profile and the Berezha Security Group profile.

Questions

Does either Applause or Berezha Security Group hold a published security certification such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
Applause's trust page states its own controls are aligned with SOC 2 rather than holding a certification, checked 2 September 2026. Berezha Security Group's service pages name ISO 27001, SOC 2 and PCI DSS only as frameworks its assessments test client systems against, checked 3 September 2026. Neither profile records a certification of its own in the catalog's certificates field, so a buyer needing a certificate number for its own audit trail has to request one directly instead of relying on either company's site.
For a buyer budgeting by the hour, which side of this pair has a stated rate on record and which does not?
Berezha Security Group's Clutch profile lists a blended hourly rate of $25 to $49, recorded 3 September 2026. Applause's own rates field carries no published figure. The comparison stops at one number: a published range on the Berezha Security Group side with no published counterpart on the Applause side to weigh it against.

Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.