QA Rating

DeviQA vs Edgescan

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

DeviQA meets the conditions for Embedded team model and Device lab coverage and Automation first; Edgescan meets none that DeviQA does not. The catalog has Frameworks, Published rates, Minimum project, Device lab only for DeviQA, and Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA only for Edgescan. Neither publishes Client stages, Onboarding, Crowd tester pool, so the table cannot answer those.

Field by field

DeviQA and Edgescan compared on the fields published for every company in this catalog
FieldDeviQAEdgescan
HeadquartersWarsaw, PolandDublin, Ireland
Delivery locationsPolandIreland, the USA
Team size201-500 people51-200 people
Founded20102011
OwnershipIndependentIndependent
ServicesTest automation, Manual testing, API testing, Compatibility testing, Performance testing, Security testing, Localization testing, Accessibility testing, Penetration testing, Usability testing, Acceptance testingPenetration testing, Security testing, Attack surface management
IndustriesHealthcare, Fintech, Banking, Ecommerce, Media, Travel, Advertising and marketing tech, Manufacturing, Real estate, Logistics, Education, TelecomBanking, Healthcare, Ecommerce, Telecom
Frameworkspublished by one of the twoPlaywright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, k6Not published
Engagement modelsManaged testing service, Staff augmentation, Dedicated teamContinuous testing program, On-demand testing
Client stagesNot publishedNot published
CertificatesNo certificate confirmed by a register entryISO/IEC 27001register entryCRESTregister entry
Signs a BAA / GDPR DPANot confirmed / Not confirmedNot confirmed / Yes
Published ratespublished by one of the twoNot published
Minimum projectpublished by one of the two$5,000clutch.coNot published
OnboardingNot publishedNot published
Crowd tester poolNot publishedNot published
Device labpublished by one of the two300 real devicesdeviqa.comNot published

Who each one fits

DeviQA fits a buyer whose testing scope covers a full application lifecycle, with security work folded into the same practice as the rest of the testing. Edgescan fits a buyer whose need is narrowly about ongoing security assessment, run as a standalone practice rather than part of a broader QA relationship.

The published case histories are shaped differently, and here the difference is about odds. DeviQA's write-ups run across separate client industries, so a buyer from most sectors has some chance of finding a project shaped like its own. Edgescan's published example is drawn from telecom infrastructure, so a buyer outside that sector reads evidence of method rather than of a comparable engagement.

That asymmetry decides what to ask. From DeviQA, ask which engagement ran closest to the system being scoped: a long list is worth little if the near matches are the old ones. From Edgescan, ask what it has assessed outside the sector its published example covers. Weigh either answer against the case studies field on the profile.

A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.

Edgescan

Edgescan meets no applicability condition in this catalog. That is a statement about what its published fields show, not about the company.

Both meet the conditions for Security focus, Nearshore for the EU, so those conditions do not separate them.

Where the data runs out

Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 79% for DeviQA and 71% for Edgescan. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.

Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Client stages, Onboarding, Crowd tester pool. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.

Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the DeviQA profile and the Edgescan profile.

Questions

What certification body verifies Edgescan's ISO/IEC 27001 registration, and does DeviQA hold a comparable verified certificate?
Edgescan's ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate, registration number 527592, is verified by Certification Europe Ltd, an IAF-accredited certification body, and stays valid until 21 August 2027. Edgescan also holds CREST membership through BCC Risk Advisory Ltd, confirmed on the CREST marketplace register and checked 2 September 2026. DeviQA's certifications field is empty. Its certifications page displays ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 20000-1 and ISTQB as badge images, with no certificate number, validity date, or registry link, checked 2 September 2026. A buyer that needs a verified standard in writing should ask DeviQA directly for the certificate number and the issuing body before treating that page as proof.
What hourly rate range does DeviQA publish on Clutch, and what does Edgescan's rates field show?
DeviQA publishes a blended hourly rate of 25 to 49 US dollars on its Clutch profile, checked 2 September 2026. Edgescan's rates field carries no published hourly figure for any grade, checked 2 September 2026. A buyer pricing the pair only has DeviQA's blended range to anchor a budget conversation, with nothing published from Edgescan to set against it. The published rates field on Edgescan's own profile is the one to recheck if a later update adds a figure.

Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.