NetSPI vs QATestLab
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
Field by field
| Field | NetSPI | QATestLab |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Minneapolis, the USA | Strovolos, Cyprus |
| Delivery locations | the USA, Canada, the UK, India | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| Team size | 501-1000 people | 501-1000 people |
| Founded | 2001 | 2005 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Services | Penetration testing, Security testing, Red teaming, Secure code review, Attack surface management | Manual testing, Test automation, QA consulting, Performance testing, Usability testing, Compatibility testing, Localization testing, API testing, Penetration testing, Security testing, Acceptance testing, Accessibility testing, Blockchain testing, IoT and device testing |
| Industries | Banking, Healthcare, Insurance | Media, Games, Ecommerce, Education, Travel, Healthcare, Fintech |
| Frameworkspublished by one of the two | Not published | Salesforce, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman |
| Engagement models | Managed testing service, Continuous testing program | Managed testing service, Staff augmentation |
| Client stages | Not published | Not published |
| Certificates | CRESTregister entry | No certificate confirmed by a register entry |
| Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA | Not confirmed / Not confirmed | Not confirmed / Not confirmed |
| Published ratespublished by one of the two | Not published |
|
| Minimum projectpublished by one of the two | Not published | $5,000clutch.co |
| Onboardingpublished by one of the two | Not published | 3 daysqatestlab.com |
| Crowd tester pool | Not published | Not published |
| Device labpublished by one of the two | Not published | 500 real devicesqatestlab.com |
Who each one fits
A team whose testing need centers on offensive security work, penetration testing or red teaming against a regulated sector such as banking or healthcare, sits closer to NetSPI's practice, whose case studies stay inside that lane. A team that instead wants a broader QA partner, pairing a security assessment with functional, performance or usability work across more industries, fits QATestLab's practice, whose published scope reaches past security testing into everyday QA work. Scope is what to settle before comparing quotes.
NetSPI's profile carries no published minimum project size, so a buyer scoping a short perimeter assessment or a red-team exercise cannot tell before the first call whether the request clears the size the vendor takes on. A quote that comes back higher than expected could mean the request sits below whatever floor the account team applies internally, with no published figure to check it against beforehand. Ask on the first call whether a minimum applies to security engagements, and whether it moves with grade, region or engagement model. Check the answer afterward against the minimum project field on NetSPI's own profile: a number given verbally and never printed there is harder to hold the vendor to.
A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.
NetSPI
Both meet the conditions for Security focus, so those conditions do not separate them.
Where the data runs out
Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 71% for NetSPI and 79% for QATestLab. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.
Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Client stages, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Crowd tester pool. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.
Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the NetSPI profile and the QATestLab profile.
Questions
- Do NetSPI's and QATestLab's published profiles cover the same range of services?
- NetSPI's published profile names five services, including penetration testing, red teaming and secure code review, checked 2 September 2026. QATestLab's published profile names fourteen services, including manual testing, test automation and performance testing, checked 2 September 2026. A team that wants one vendor to run a security assessment alongside functional or performance testing finds those additional service types named only on QATestLab's page. NetSPI's shorter list stays inside offensive security work, so services outside that scope, such as accessibility or localization testing, are not named on its profile at all.
- How many countries does each company's published profile list as delivery locations, and where do they overlap?
- NetSPI's published profile lists delivery locations in four countries, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and India, checked 2 September 2026. QATestLab's published profile lists delivery locations in five countries, Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine and the United Kingdom, checked 2 September 2026. The United Kingdom is the only country that appears on both lists, so it is the one delivery location a buyer can check against either company's profile today. QATestLab's Poland and Ukraine locations and NetSPI's India location sit outside the other company's list, so a buyer wanting delivery from any of those three specifically will find it named on only one of the two profiles.
Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.