PLUS QA vs Ubertesters
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
Field by field
| Field | PLUS QA | Ubertesters |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Portland, the USA | Ramsey, the USA |
| Delivery locations | the USA | the USA |
| Team size | 51-200 people | 51-200 people |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Services | Manual testing, Compatibility testing, Usability testing, AI system testing, API testing, Payment flow testing, Test automation, Localization testing, Accessibility testing, Mobile app testing, AR/VR testing, IoT and device testing | Manual testing, Usability testing, Payment flow testing, Localization testing, Accessibility testing, Mobile app testing, IoT and device testing |
| Industries | Ecommerce | Games, Fintech, Ecommerce, SaaS, Healthcare, Automotive, Travel, Education |
| Frameworkspublished by one of the two | pytest, TestNG, JUnit, Selenium, Appium, Postman | Not published |
| Engagement models | Managed testing service | Crowdtesting, Managed testing service, Dedicated team |
| Client stagespublished by one of the two | Startups, Agencies | Not published |
| Certificates | No certificate confirmed by a register entry | No certificate confirmed by a register entry |
| Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA | Not confirmed / Not confirmed | Not confirmed / Not confirmed |
| Published rates |
|
|
| Minimum project | $1,000clutch.co | $1,000clutch.co |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published |
| Crowd tester poolpublished by one of the two | Not published | 120,000ubertesters.com |
| Device lab | 600 real devicesplusqa.com | 600,000 real devicesubertesters.com |
Who each one fits
A team whose testing need centers on ecommerce fits PLUS QA, whose published service list and case material stay inside that industry, delivered by a team already assigned to the account. A team whose product mix reaches past that into other sectors, a travel booking flow alongside a fintech app, is closer to Ubertesters, whose profile also opens the door to an outside pool of testers picking up devices rather than an assigned team alone.
Ubertesters's frameworks field carries nothing, so a team arriving with automated tests already written finds no published tool name to check against before a call starts. A buyer in that position cannot tell ahead of time whether an existing suite would run against Ubertesters's process as written or would need reworking around whatever pipeline it actually uses. Ask on the first call which automated tools Ubertesters supports, if any, and whether an outside suite can point at its environment directly. Weigh the answer against Ubertesters's frameworks field afterward: a page that later names a tool can be checked against what the call promised.
A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.
PLUS QA
PLUS QA meets no applicability condition in this catalog. That is a statement about what its published fields show, not about the company.
Ubertesters
Both meet the conditions for Device lab coverage, so those conditions do not separate them.
Where the data runs out
Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 71% for PLUS QA and 71% for Ubertesters. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.
Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.
Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the PLUS QA profile and the Ubertesters profile.
Questions
- Does Ubertesters publish the size of its crowdtesting tester pool, and does PLUS QA carry a matching figure?
- Ubertesters's published profile states a crowdtesting tester pool of 120,000 people, checked 3 September 2026. PLUS QA's published profile carries no tester pool figure at all, checked 6 September 2026. A buyer weighing a crowdtesting engagement against PLUS QA's own device-based practice has a stated pool size to check on Ubertesters's side and no equivalent number to check on PLUS QA's page. The published figure alone does not say how many of those testers were active on a given assignment, only that a pool of that size exists on paper.
- What ownership type does each company's published profile record, and does that record name a parent company for either one?
- PLUS QA's published profile records its ownership type as independent, checked 6 September 2026. Ubertesters's published profile records the same ownership type, independent, checked 3 September 2026. Neither profile names a parent company or a holding group behind either business. A matching independent label on each entry reflects what each source states today, not a commitment against a future sale or merger.
Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.