QASource vs QualityLogic
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
Field by field
| Field | QASource | QualityLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Pleasanton, the USA | Boise, the USA |
| Delivery locations | the USA, India, Mexico | the USA |
| Team size | 1000 or more people | 51-200 people |
| Founded | 2000 | 1986 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Services | API testing, AI system testing, Blockchain testing, Performance testing, Manual testing, Mobile app testing, QA consulting, Security testing, Test automation, Red teaming | Accessibility testing, Manual testing, Test automation, Usability testing, Performance testing, API testing |
| Industries | SaaS, Healthcare, Banking, Manufacturing, Media | Energy and utilities, Telecom, Ecommerce, Media, Education, Healthcare, Fintech |
| Frameworks | Salesforce, Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Apache JMeter, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest | Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Katalon, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Playwright |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, On-demand testing | Staff augmentation, Managed testing service |
| Client stages | Startups, Enterprises | Startups, Enterprises |
| Certificates | No certificate confirmed by a register entry | No certificate confirmed by a register entry |
| Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA | Not confirmed / Not confirmed | Not confirmed / Not confirmed |
| Published rates |
|
|
| Minimum project | $25,000clutch.co | $5,000clutch.co |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published |
| Crowd tester pool | Not published | Not published |
| Device labpublished by one of the two | Not published | 400 real devicesqualitylogic.com |
Who each one fits
QualityLogic's published work runs where software meets equipment it has to interoperate with, and its case material sits in that territory rather than inside a self-contained application. QASource's published work sits on the other side of that line, embedded with product teams on platforms that talk to hardware without being hardware. A buyer arrives at this pair when a product straddles that line, and the question underneath the comparison is whether the same vendor can carry it end to end.
That is why the device question is worth pressing here, and QASource's published record leaves it open. Nothing on the profile names a bench of physical handsets or tablets, so a buyer weighing a release across a spread of models and OS versions cannot tell from the page what that release gets tested against before customers see it. The silence costs most exactly where this pair gets compared: a product with a wide or fast-moving device footprint. Ask on the first call which handsets and OS versions are exercised before a release ships, and who owns that hardware. Then check the answer against whatever device lab entry QASource eventually publishes.
A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.
QualityLogic
Both meet the conditions for Automation first, Performance engineering, so those conditions do not separate them.
Where the data runs out
Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 86% for QASource and 86% for QualityLogic. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.
Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding, Crowd tester pool. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.
Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the QASource profile and the QualityLogic profile.
Questions
- Which industries appear on each company's published profile?
- QASource's published profile names five industries, SaaS, Healthcare, Banking, Manufacturing and Media, checked 2 September 2026. QualityLogic's published profile names seven industries, Energy and utilities, Telecom, Ecommerce, Media, Education, Healthcare and Fintech, checked 2 September 2026. Healthcare and Media appear on both lists. Every other industry named on either profile belongs to only one of the two. A buyer working in a sector absent from both lists finds neither profile naming its industry by name.
- In what year was each company founded, according to its published profile?
- QASource's published profile states a founding year of 2000, checked 2 September 2026. QualityLogic's published profile states a founding year of 1986, checked 2 September 2026. A duplicate directory listing for QASource shows a founding year of 2002, checked the same date. The catalog treats the verified profile as the figure on record. QualityLogic's founding year carries no such conflicting listing in the published record.
Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.