How many services does each company's published profile list?

QualityLogic's published profile lists six services, checked 2 September 2026. TestFort's published profile lists thirteen services, checked 3 September 2026. A buyer who needs one narrow test type covered can shortlist against either page's list directly. A buyer assembling a request that spans several adjacent test types has more of TestFort's catalog to check against before ruling anything out.

Where is each company's published headquarters located?

QualityLogic's published headquarters is in Boise, in the US, checked 2 September 2026. TestFort's published headquarters is in London, in the UK, checked 3 September 2026. The listed cities sit in different legal systems, so the contract a buyer signs is governed by whichever entity puts its name to it. Confirming which registered entity appears on the paperwork is worth doing early, since a headquarters city names a place and not necessarily the signing party.

QualityLogic vs TestFort

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

QualityLogic meets the conditions for Device lab coverage and Automation first; TestFort meets the conditions for Embedded team model and Nearshore for the EU. The catalog has Device lab only for QualityLogic. Neither publishes Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding, Crowd tester pool, so the table cannot answer those.

Field by field

QualityLogic and TestFort compared on the fields published for every company in this catalog
Field	QualityLogic	TestFort
Headquarters	Boise, the USA	London, the UK
Delivery locations	the USA	the UK, the USA, Ukraine
Team size	51-200 people	51-200 people
Founded	1986	2001
Ownership	Independent	Subsidiary
Services	Accessibility testing, Manual testing, Test automation, Usability testing, Performance testing, API testing	Manual testing, Test automation, AI system testing, QA consulting, Performance testing, Usability testing, API testing, Acceptance testing, Localization testing, Accessibility testing, Mobile app testing, IoT and device testing, ERP testing
Industries	Energy and utilities, Telecom, Ecommerce, Media, Education, Healthcare, Fintech	Games, Healthcare, Ecommerce, Banking, Fintech, Media, Insurance, Logistics
Frameworks	Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Katalon, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Playwright	SAP, Selenium, Appium
Engagement models	Staff augmentation, Managed testing service	Dedicated team, Managed testing service
Client stages	Startups, Enterprises	Startups
Certificates	No certificate confirmed by a register entry	No certificate confirmed by a register entry
Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA	Not confirmed / Not confirmed	Not confirmed / Not confirmed
Published rates	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co
Minimum project	$5,000clutch.co	$10,000clutch.co
Onboarding	Not published	Not published
Crowd tester pool	Not published	Not published
Device labpublished by one of the two	400 real devicesqualitylogic.com	Not published

Who each one fits

QualityLogic answers testing problems by building instrumentation: its published work includes an analyzer it built to check interoperability between EV charging equipment. That is the practice of a vendor investing in a bench. TestFort's published work moves between a recovery wearable for fitness studios, an Odoo-based ERP deployment and a password manager, products sharing no user, no environment, no failure mode. That is a vendor investing in people who can be pointed at whatever arrives next. A buyer lands here when a product needs some of each: equipment behaviour to verify, and consumers to verify it for.

Where those consumers come from goes unsettled on each page. A wearable or a password manager fails in ways a bench cannot stage: an odd handset, a slow network, a habit nobody designed for. Reaching that variety means reaching people outside the vendor's own staff, and the pages say nothing about whether that is on offer. It costs most the buyer who came for the equipment side and must ship the result to the public. Ask on the first call who tests outside the office and how those people are found. Check it later against whatever the crowd tester pool field eventually carries.

A tag is attached when the company's published fields meet its condition, never by judgement. Both lists come from the same closed vocabulary, so a tag missing from one side means the condition was not met, not that nobody looked.

QualityLogic

TestFort

Both meet the conditions for Performance engineering, so those conditions do not separate them.

Where the data runs out

Completeness against the 14 fields of the comparison checklist is 86% for QualityLogic and 86% for TestFort. A field is counted as filled when a source confirms it, so a gap means nobody published it.

Neither company has a value recorded for these fields: Certificates, Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA, Onboarding, Crowd tester pool. The table shows those rows empty rather than estimating them.

Field definitions and the completeness checklist are on the methodology page. The sources behind each field are listed on the QualityLogic profile and the TestFort profile.

Questions

How many services does each company's published profile list?: QualityLogic's published profile lists six services, checked 2 September 2026. TestFort's published profile lists thirteen services, checked 3 September 2026. A buyer who needs one narrow test type covered can shortlist against either page's list directly. A buyer assembling a request that spans several adjacent test types has more of TestFort's catalog to check against before ruling anything out.
Where is each company's published headquarters located?: QualityLogic's published headquarters is in Boise, in the US, checked 2 September 2026. TestFort's published headquarters is in London, in the UK, checked 3 September 2026. The listed cities sit in different legal systems, so the contract a buyer signs is governed by whichever entity puts its name to it. Confirming which registered entity appears on the paperwork is worth doing early, since a headquarters city names a place and not necessarily the signing party.

Published by QA RatingUpdated on September 6, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.