QA Rating

This is the 2026 version of this list, taken on 2026-09-03. The current version is at Engagement model: crowdtesting.

QA companies for crowdtesting in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

This is the 2026 state of the list, taken on September 3, 2026, with 11 companies. Since then 3 entered the list and 0 left it, and 11 changed position. Field values on this page are the ones recorded at the time of the snapshot.
11 companies in this version. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies, as of 2026-09-03

Crowdtesting: 11 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#CompanyPublished ratesMinimum projectOnboardingReviews
Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
1Global App TestingNot published$10,000globalapptesting.comNot published66
2ApplauseNot publishedNot publishedNot published39
3UNGUESSNot publishedNot publishedNot published27
4Ubertesters$1,000clutch.coNot published7
5Beta FamilyNot publishedNot publishedNot published2
6DigivanteNot publishedNot publishedNot published0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1Global App TestingNot published$10,000globalapptesting.comNot published66
2ApplauseNot publishedNot publishedNot published39
3UNGUESSNot publishedNot publishedNot published27
7QA Mentor$1,000clutch.coNot published7
5Beta FamilyNot publishedNot publishedNot published2
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
8BugRaptors$1,000clutch.coNot published26
9QualityAINot publishedNot publishedNot published0
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
4Ubertesters$1,000clutch.coNot published7
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
8BugRaptors$1,000clutch.coNot published26
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
10BugcrowdNot publishedNot publishedNot published0
11BugwolfNot publishedNot publishedNot published0

What changed since

  • Entered the list since this snapshot: testlio, mtp, secuna.
  • Left the list since this snapshot: none.
  • Changed position: Global App Testing from 1 to 2, Applause from 2 to 3, UNGUESS from 3 to 4, QA Mentor from 7 to 5, Beta Family from 5 to 6, Ubertesters from 4 to 8, Digivante from 6 to 9, QualityAI from 9 to 10, BugRaptors from 8 to 11, Bugcrowd from 10 to 12, Bugwolf from 11 to 13.

Every change of composition and order between versions is recorded in the changelog.

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.