Best QA companies in the UK, 2026
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
The companies
| # | Company | Delivery locations | Published rates | Team size | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova. | |||||
| 1 | Global App Testing | the UK, Romania | Not published | 51-200 people | 66 |
| 2 | BreachLock | the USA, the UK, the Netherlands, India | Not published | 51-200 people | 40 |
| 3 | TestFort | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 4 | UNGUESS | Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK | Not published | 51-200 people | 27 |
| 5 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 6 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 7 | QA Mentor | the USA, the UK, France, Ukraine, Israel, Thailand, Romania, Tunisia, India |
| 201-500 people | 7 |
| 8 | Cobalt | the USA, Germany, the UK | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 9 | Cossack Labs | Ukraine, the UK | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 10 | Critical Software | Portugal, the UK, Germany, the USA | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 11 | GlobalStep | the USA, Canada, the UK, Romania, Spain, France, Portugal, India | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 12 | Side | the UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, Brazil | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 13 | Testronic | the UK, Poland, the USA, the Philippines, Romania, Serbia | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric. | |||||
| 14 | BugRaptors | India, the USA, the UK, Australia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 26 |
| 15 | Abstracta | the USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 5 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 16 | 2i | the UK, India | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 10 | Critical Software | Portugal, the UK, Germany, the USA | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 17 | ImpactQA | the USA, the UK, India | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 18 | QualityAI | the UK | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 19 | Testhouse | the UK, the USA, Australia, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, India |
| 501-1000 people | 0 |
| Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 3 | TestFort | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 5 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 16 | 2i | the UK, India | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 17 | ImpactQA | the USA, the UK, India | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 18 | QualityAI | the UK | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America. | |||||
| 15 | Abstracta | the USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 5 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 20 | NetSPI | the USA, Canada, the UK, India | Not published | 501-1000 people | 11 |
| 11 | GlobalStep | the USA, Canada, the UK, Romania, Spain, France, Portugal, India | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 12 | Side | the UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, Brazil | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric. | |||||
| 3 | TestFort | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 14 | BugRaptors | India, the USA, the UK, Australia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 26 |
| 15 | Abstracta | the USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 6 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 21 | PFLB | the USA, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 6 |
| Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 6 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 20 | NetSPI | the USA, Canada, the UK, India | Not published | 501-1000 people | 11 |
| 22 | Bishop Fox | the USA, the UK | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 8 | Cobalt | the USA, Germany, the UK | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source. | |||||
| 1 | Global App Testing | the UK, Romania | Not published | 51-200 people | 66 |
| 4 | UNGUESS | Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK | Not published | 51-200 people | 27 |
| 23 | Digivante | the UK | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source. | |||||
| 6 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 24 | iXie Gaming | the USA, India, the UK, Singapore |
| 501-1000 people | 3 |
| Enterprises A verified ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 certificate, a published team size of 201-500 or larger, and at least one named client that is a publicly traded company, each with a source. A company that publishes no team size does not carry this tag. | |||||
| 12 | Side | the UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, Brazil | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source. | |||||
| 6 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles. | |||||
| 25 | Indium Software | India, the USA, the UK, Singapore, Australia, Japan | Not published | 1000 or more people | 21 |
| 26 | Kualitatem | the USA, the UK, Pakistan, the UAE |
| 51-200 people | 9 |
| 27 | Testrig Technologies | India, the UK, the USA |
| 51-200 people | 7 |
| 28 | Zoonou | the UK | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
What places a company on the UK page
The geography axis is built on the Delivery locations field, the list of countries where a company runs testing work, and this field is separate from headquarters, which records where a company is registered. A confirmed UK entry in Delivery locations is what puts a company on this page, and headquarters is free to sit anywhere. Ten of the 28 companies here keep a headquarters inside the United Kingdom. The other 18 are headquartered elsewhere, spread across five further countries, and none of the 18 is excluded from this page for that reason: the qualifying fact is the delivery location entry itself, checked against a source, and the registration address plays no part in it.
How the applicability tags overlap in this composition
Embedded team model holds five companies: TestFort, a1qa, 2i, ImpactQA and QualityAI. Four of the five, a1qa, 2i, ImpactQA and QualityAI, also carry Automation first. The fifth, TestFort, does not carry Automation first.
Security focus also holds four companies: QATestLab, NetSPI, Bishop Fox and Cobalt. Two of the four, QATestLab and Cobalt, also carry Nearshore for the EU. One, NetSPI, carries Nearshore for the USA instead. Bishop Fox carries no other tag on this page.
Crowdtesting at scale holds three companies: Global App Testing, UNGUESS and Digivante. Two of the three, Global App Testing and UNGUESS, also carry Nearshore for the EU. The third, Digivante, does not carry Nearshore for the EU.
Device lab coverage holds two companies, QATestLab and iXie Gaming. QATestLab is the one company on this page carrying five applicability tags at once: Fast onboarding, Device lab coverage, Performance engineering, Security focus and Nearshore for the EU. iXie Gaming carries no other tag on this page.
Enterprises and Fast onboarding each hold a single company. Side carries Enterprises, alongside Nearshore for the EU and Nearshore for the USA. QATestLab, already named above, carries Fast onboarding.
Four companies on this page carry no applicability tag at all: Indium Software, Kualitatem, Testrig Technologies and Zoonou. No recorded criteria for any group on this page are met by any of the four.
Automation first and Performance engineering
Performance engineering holds five companies: TestFort, BugRaptors, Abstracta, QATestLab and PFLB. Two of the five, BugRaptors and Abstracta, also carry Automation first. Two others, TestFort and QATestLab, also carry Nearshore for the EU. The fifth, PFLB, carries no other tag on this page.
Automation first holds eight companies in total. Two of them, BugRaptors and Abstracta, are the same two named above under Performance engineering. Four more, a1qa, 2i, ImpactQA and QualityAI, are the same four named above under Embedded team model. One, Critical Software, also carries Nearshore for the EU. The remaining one, Testhouse, carries no other tag on this page.
Nearshore for the USA and Nearshore for the EU
Nearshore for the USA holds five companies: Abstracta, a1qa, NetSPI, GlobalStep and Side. A UK delivery location does not by itself satisfy this tag: its condition names a delivery location in the region that tag covers, a different region from the one that puts a company on this page, so each of the five earns Nearshore for the USA through a separate, second delivery location.
Nearshore for the EU is the largest group on this page, with 13 companies. Four of the 13 carry no other tag: BreachLock, QA Mentor, Cossack Labs and Testronic. The other nine combine Nearshore for the EU with at least one further tag, and each of those nine has already been named above in the group that further tag belongs to.
Field coverage beyond the applicability tags
Nine fields recorded for this composition show a gap between companies with a published, sourced answer and companies with none. A confirmed certificate is recorded for 9 of the 28 companies, leaving 19 with no certificate confirmed by a source. At least one published case study is recorded for 20 of the 28, leaving 8 with none. Named clients are unfilled for 5 of the 28, a smaller gap than any other field in this list. Engagement models are unfilled for 7 of the 28. Frameworks are unfilled for 15 of the 28, and client stages for 18 of the 28. Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA carries a wider gap than any other field in this list, unfilled for 26 of the 28. An unfilled field records the absence of a published, sourced answer, not a negative claim that the company declined to provide one.
How this ranking was put together
Membership is computed from the profile, not chosen: companies appear here when they have a delivery location in one of the countries the UK covers, as their own profile states. Position in a ranking cannot be bought. Paid options are limited to the extended profile, labelled sponsor slots and lead forms, and none of them affect tags or order.
The table compares the fields that decide this axis: delivery locations, published rates, team size, plus the number of verified reviews on external platforms. Rates, minimum project size and onboarding time carry the source they came from next to the value.
- Nearshore for the EU: At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
- Automation first: Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
- Embedded team model: The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
- Nearshore for the USA: At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
- Performance engineering: Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
- Security focus: Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
- Crowdtesting at scale: The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
- Device lab coverage: A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
- Enterprises: A verified ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 certificate, a published team size of 201-500 or larger, and at least one named client that is a publicly traded company, each with a source. A company that publishes no team size does not carry this tag.
- Fast onboarding: A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
The criteria for this axis are on the methodology page, together with field definitions and the rule for editorial order. Changes of order are recorded in the changelog.
Questions
- Among the companies here that publish an hourly rate, how are the published bands distributed?
- 11 of the 28 companies with a UK delivery location publish a blended hourly rate band. 3 of the 11 publish a band under $25 per hour, 4 publish a band from $25 to $49, and 4 publish a band from $50 to $99. None of the 11 publishes a band at $100 per hour or above.
- What does a UK delivery location mean for moving personal data to and from an EU-based client?
- A UK delivery location sits outside the European Union following the UK's departure from the bloc, so personal data moving between that location and an EU-based client relies on a transfer mechanism separate from the EU's own internal transfer rules. 12 of the 28 companies with a UK delivery location are themselves headquartered in the United States and 3 in India, jurisdictions that raise the same cross-border question on their own account, independently of the UK link. The delivery-location field records where the testing work happens; the agreement that governs a specific data transfer between that location and an EU-based client is a separate document the field does not capture.
- What does a recorded CREST certification suggest for a company bidding into UK public-sector security testing work?
- CREST is administered from the UK and is commonly named as a supplier qualification in UK public-sector penetration-testing tenders, so a recorded CREST certification signals that a company has already cleared a scheme that market may require directly. 5 of the 28 companies with a UK delivery location carry a recorded CREST certification, each checked against a source before publication. UK public-sector contracts sometimes name a specific accreditation scheme as a tender requirement, and CREST is only one of several a buyer may encounter. A buyer bidding into a tender that names a specific scheme should confirm which one the contract requires before assuming a CREST record satisfies it.
- How does a UK delivery team's working day line up with a buyer's morning in the United States compared with one in continental Europe?
- A UK working day runs on GMT or British Summer Time, roughly five hours ahead of the US East Coast and no more than one or two hours behind Western Europe, so a UK team's afternoon overlaps with a US East Coast morning while its whole day overlaps with a Berlin or Madrid office. 12 of the 28 companies with a UK delivery location report a team size of 501 people or more, and a team at that size is more likely to staff a shift spanning both windows than a team in the smallest size band. Time zone overlap and legal jurisdiction are two separate questions, and a favorable overlap on one says nothing about the other.
Previous versions
Each year is frozen as it stood when the snapshot was taken, with the field values recorded at that date. This page always shows the current version.
- The 2026 list: 25 companies, taken 2026-09-03. 3 entered and 0 left since.
Other axes these companies appear on
- Industry: Healthcare 21 of these 28 companies also stand there
- Industry: Banking 20 of these 28 companies also stand there
- Industry: Ecommerce 19 of these 28 companies also stand there
- Type of testing: Manual testing 16 of these 28 companies also stand there
Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 5, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.