QA Rating

Best QA companies in the USA, 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

54 testing companies in this catalog have a delivery location in one of the countries the USA covers. They are grouped below by what each is best suited for, in 9 groups. 11 of them hold a certificate confirmed by a register entry and 30 publish a rate card. Composition and order last changed on September 6, 2026.
54 companies. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies

the USA: 54 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#CompanyDelivery locationsPublished ratesTeam sizeReviews
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
1ScienceSoftthe USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE501-1000 people85
2QA Wolfthe USANot published51-200 people65
3QualityLogicthe USA51-200 people37
4QASourcethe USA, India, Mexico1000 or more people29
5BugRaptorsIndia, the USA, the UK, Australia, the UAE501-1000 people26
6Abstractathe USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK51-200 people24
7Luxe Qualitythe USA, Spain, Ukraine51-200 people21
8QAlifiedUruguay, the USA11-50 people21
9a1qathe USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico1000 or more people20
10OnPath Testingthe USA11-50 people17
11QAbleIndia, the USA51-200 people8
12Frugal TestingIndia, the USA51-200 people7
13MoolyaIndia, the USA501-1000 people7
14Sofka TechnologiesColombia, the USA, Mexico, Uruguay, Ecuador, Panama501-1000 people7
15CodoidIndia, the USA, Singapore, Norway51-200 people5
16Critical SoftwarePortugal, the UK, Germany, the USANot published1000 or more people0
17ImpactQAthe USA, the UK, IndiaNot published201-500 people0
18Testhousethe UK, the USA, Australia, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, India501-1000 people0
19Yethi ConsultingIndia, the UAE, the USANot published501-1000 people0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1ScienceSoftthe USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE501-1000 people85
20Testliothe USA, Estonia51-200 people76
21EdgescanIreland, the USANot published51-200 people53
22BreachLockthe USA, the UK, the Netherlands, IndiaNot published51-200 people40
23Applausethe USA, Germany, Israel, Poland, IndiaNot published201-500 people39
24TestFortthe UK, the USA, Ukraine51-200 people32
7Luxe Qualitythe USA, Spain, Ukraine51-200 people21
9a1qathe USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico1000 or more people20
25QA Mentorthe USA, the UK, France, Ukraine, Israel, Thailand, Romania, Tunisia, India201-500 people7
15CodoidIndia, the USA, Singapore, Norway51-200 people5
26Cobaltthe USA, Germany, the UKNot published201-500 people0
16Critical SoftwarePortugal, the UK, Germany, the USANot published1000 or more people0
27GlobalStepthe USA, Canada, the UK, Romania, Spain, France, Portugal, IndiaNot published1000 or more people0
28Sidethe UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, BrazilNot published1000 or more people0
29Testronicthe UK, Poland, the USA, the Philippines, Romania, SerbiaNot published1000 or more people0
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
1ScienceSoftthe USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE501-1000 people85
30PacketlabsCanada, the USA, AustraliaNot published51-200 people72
4QASourcethe USA, India, Mexico1000 or more people29
6Abstractathe USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK51-200 people24
8QAlifiedUruguay, the USA11-50 people21
9a1qathe USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico1000 or more people20
31ILoveMyQACanada, the USA11-50 people11
32NetSPIthe USA, Canada, the UK, IndiaNot published501-1000 people11
14Sofka TechnologiesColombia, the USA, Mexico, Uruguay, Ecuador, Panama501-1000 people7
27GlobalStepthe USA, Canada, the UK, Romania, Spain, France, Portugal, IndiaNot published1000 or more people0
28Sidethe UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, BrazilNot published1000 or more people0
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
20Testliothe USA, Estonia51-200 people76
2QA Wolfthe USANot published51-200 people65
24TestFortthe UK, the USA, Ukraine51-200 people32
4QASourcethe USA, India, Mexico1000 or more people29
9a1qathe USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico1000 or more people20
11QAbleIndia, the USA51-200 people8
33Ubertestersthe USA51-200 people7
17ImpactQAthe USA, the UK, IndiaNot published201-500 people0
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
3QualityLogicthe USA51-200 people37
24TestFortthe UK, the USA, Ukraine51-200 people32
4QASourcethe USA, India, Mexico1000 or more people29
5BugRaptorsIndia, the USA, the UK, Australia, the UAE501-1000 people26
6Abstractathe USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK51-200 people24
34PFLBthe USA, the UK51-200 people6
35MuukTestthe USANot published11-50 people0
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
1ScienceSoftthe USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE501-1000 people85
21EdgescanIreland, the USANot published51-200 people53
32NetSPIthe USA, Canada, the UK, IndiaNot published501-1000 people11
36Bishop Foxthe USA, the UKNot published201-500 people0
26Cobaltthe USA, Germany, the UKNot published201-500 people0
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
3QualityLogicthe USA51-200 people37
37PLUS QAthe USA51-200 people8
33Ubertestersthe USA51-200 people7
38iXie Gamingthe USA, India, the UK, Singapore501-1000 people3
Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
23Applausethe USA, Germany, Israel, Poland, IndiaNot published201-500 people39
33Ubertestersthe USA51-200 people7
Enterprises A verified ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 certificate, a published team size of 201-500 or larger, and at least one named client that is a publicly traded company, each with a source. A company that publishes no team size does not carry this tag.
28Sidethe UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, BrazilNot published1000 or more people0
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
39Indium SoftwareIndia, the USA, the UK, Singapore, Australia, JapanNot published1000 or more people21
40Q-Prosthe USA, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan, South Africa501-1000 people20
41Coderiothe USA501-1000 people10
42Kualitatemthe USA, the UK, Pakistan, the UAE51-200 people9
43Lotus Quality AssuranceVietnam, Japan, the USA, South KoreaNot published201-500 people9
44Halo Securitythe USANot published11-50 people8
45Testrig TechnologiesIndia, the UK, the USA51-200 people7
46iBeta Quality Assurancethe USA51-200 people4
47AGEST VietnamVietnam, Japan, the USANot published201-500 people0
48Bugcrowdthe USANot published201-500 people0
49Pointwestthe Philippines, the USANot published51-200 people0
50QualiZealthe USA, IndiaNot published1000 or more people0
51RTTSthe USANot published51-200 people0
52TestbytesIndia, the USA51-200 people0
53TestingXpertsthe USA1000 or more people0
54TestVagrantIndia, the USA, Singapore, AustraliaNot published51-200 people0

Delivery location versus headquarters

This axis groups companies by where a team delivers testing work inside the United States, a field recorded separately from headquarters, which names where a company is legally based. Of the 54 companies on this page, 31 are headquartered in the United States itself. Ten are headquartered in India, four in the United Kingdom, two in Canada, two in Vietnam, and one each in Ireland, Uruguay, Colombia, Portugal and the Philippines, and every one of the 54 reports a delivery location inside the US, which is what places it on this page. Headquarters names a legal seat, and the geography axis names where a team is staffed; the two point to different countries for 23 of the 54 companies here, and each of those 23 qualifies for this page through the delivery location alone.

Why the Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA field carries extra weight here

A business associate agreement is a commitment tied to US federal health privacy law, and it applies when a vendor handles protected health information for a US healthcare client. Every company on this page delivers testing work from inside the US for at least one location, which puts each one in the position a healthcare buyer would check before sharing patient data for a testing engagement. That background is why the BAA half of the Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA field carries more direct weight on a page organized around US delivery than it would on a page built around a different criterion. The field is unrecorded for 50 of the 54 companies on this page. An unrecorded field is not a denial that such an agreement exists, only the absence of a published source confirming it.

Where a US delivery location combines with other regions

15 of the 54 companies on this page also carry the Nearshore for the EU tag, each keeping at least one delivery location in a country covered by that tag in addition to its US location. 11 of the 54 companies carry the Nearshore for the USA tag, read from a delivery location elsewhere in the Americas. Four of those eleven, ScienceSoft, a1qa, GlobalStep and Side, also carry the Nearshore for the EU tag, so their footprint spans the US, at least one EU or adjacent country, and at least one other country in the Americas. The remaining seven companies with the Nearshore for the USA tag combine a US delivery location with an Americas location and no EU or adjacent one. Side also carries the Enterprises tag, the only company on this page to do so.

Security testing without a matching certificate

Edgescan, NetSPI, Bishop Fox and Cobalt carry the Security focus tag alongside ScienceSoft, the full set of five companies on this page with that tag. One of the five holds a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate; the other four meet the tag through the penetration testing route instead, since the condition accepts either the certificate or the pentest service, together with a published case study.

Dedicated teams as a distinct discipline

TestFort, QAble and ImpactQA carry the Embedded team model tag alongside a1qa. Four more companies on this page carry it as well: Testlio, QA Wolf, QASource and Ubertesters, which brings the tag to 8 of the 54 companies here. The tag reads two fields at once, the dedicated team engagement model and a published case study, so a company can offer the model and still miss the tag for want of a case study.

Device labs and crowdtesting overlap once

QualityLogic, Ubertesters, PLUS QA and iXie Gaming carry the Device lab coverage tag, the full set of four on this page. Applause and Ubertesters carry the Crowdtesting at scale tag, the full set of two. Ubertesters is the only company on this page carrying both tags, combining a published device lab with a published crowdtesting pool. The other three device lab companies do not carry the crowdtesting tag, and Applause does not carry the device lab tag.

Companies with no tag on this page

Indium Software, Q-Pros, Coderio, Kualitatem, Lotus Quality Assurance, Halo Security, Testrig Technologies, iBeta Quality Assurance, AGEST Vietnam, Bugcrowd, Pointwest, QualiZeal, RTTS, Testbytes, TestingXperts and TestVagrant carry none of the nine tags used on this page. Sixteen of the 54 companies on this page fall into this group, more than carry the Enterprises, Crowdtesting at scale and Device lab coverage tags combined. Seven of these sixteen are headquartered outside the United States, a larger share than the 23 in 54 the page holds as a whole.

How this ranking was put together

Membership is computed from the profile, not chosen: companies appear here when they have a delivery location in one of the countries the USA covers, as their own profile states. Position in a ranking cannot be bought. Paid options are limited to the extended profile, labelled sponsor slots and lead forms, and none of them affect tags or order.

The table compares the fields that decide this axis: delivery locations, published rates, team size, plus the number of verified reviews on external platforms. Rates, minimum project size and onboarding time carry the source they came from next to the value.

  • Automation first: Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
  • Nearshore for the EU: At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
  • Nearshore for the USA: At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
  • Embedded team model: The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
  • Performance engineering: Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
  • Security focus: Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
  • Device lab coverage: A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
  • Crowdtesting at scale: The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
  • Enterprises: A verified ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 certificate, a published team size of 201-500 or larger, and at least one named client that is a publicly traded company, each with a source. A company that publishes no team size does not carry this tag.

The criteria for this axis are on the methodology page, together with field definitions and the rule for editorial order. Changes of order are recorded in the changelog.

Questions

US delivery is the expensive option on most shortlists. Where does the entry ticket actually start?
At 1,000 US dollars, and it climbs steeply from there. Seven companies publish that floor, and eleven publish 5,000 dollars, the most common figure here. Seven more publish 10,000 dollars, level with the 1,000 dollar floor, and one publishes 5,995 dollars, just above that pair. Above them, two publish 25,000 dollars, two publish 50,000 dollars, one publishes 75,000 dollars, one publishes 100,000 dollars and one publishes 250,000 dollars, which is 250 times the lowest floor recorded. Twenty-one companies publish no floor at all. The field holds the smallest engagement a company says it will accept, so it marks a threshold rather than a price.
We are a scaleup, past the startup stage and short of an enterprise. Does anything point at companies used to that size?
One profile names that stage directly. Nine companies name startups and enterprises together. Ten name enterprises alone. One names startups alone, and one names startups together with agencies rather than enterprises. Thirty-two name no client stage at all. The single profile that names a scaleup names all three stages at once, so it does not single the middle out either. A buyer in the middle is choosing among profiles that describe the two ends of the range and one that describes the whole of it.
Whose names can we actually open and check before we shortlist?
Each name comes with the source it was read from, a case study, a testimonial or a published client list, so every one of them can be opened. Thirty-nine profiles carry at least one name. Three of those carry 15, 13 and 12 names, and no other profile reaches ten; below the top three the counts run from one to nine. Fifteen profiles carry no name at all. The field holds the name and its citation, without the year of the work or how much of it there was.

Previous versions

Each year is frozen as it stood when the snapshot was taken, with the field values recorded at that date. This page always shows the current version.

  • The 2026 list: 43 companies, taken 2026-09-03. 11 entered and 0 left since.

Other axes these companies appear on

How to choose a vendor on this axis

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.