This is the 2026 version of this list, taken on 2026-09-03. The current version is at Industry: Ecommerce.

Ecommerce QA companies in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

This is the 2026 state of the list, taken on September 3, 2026, with 51 companies. Since then 22 entered the list and 0 left it, and 50 changed position. Field values on this page are the ones recorded at the time of the snapshot.

51 companies in this version. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies, as of 2026-09-03

Ecommerce: 51 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#	Company	Certificates	Case studies	Team size	Reviews
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
1	ScienceSoft	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	85
2	QA Wolf	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	65
3	DeviQA	None confirmed	5	201-500 people	44
4	QA Madness	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	44
5	QualityLogic	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	37
6	BugRaptors	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	26
7	Abstracta	None confirmed	4	51-200 people	24
8	Luxe Quality	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	21
9	QAlified	None confirmed	5	11-50 people	21
10	a1qa	None confirmed	3	1000 or more people	20
11	OnPath Testing	None confirmed	3	11-50 people	17
12	QAwerk	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	13
13	QAble	None confirmed	4	51-200 people	8
14	Savarian.tech	None confirmed	3	11-50 people	8
15	Frugal Testing	None confirmed	1	51-200 people	7
16	Moolya	None confirmed	4	501-1000 people	7
17	Sofka Technologies	None confirmed	1	501-1000 people	7
18	Codoid	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	5
19	Software Testing Bureau	None confirmed	1	11-50 people	1
20	BetterQA	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry	4	11-50 people	0
21	ImpactQA	None confirmed	5	201-500 people	0
22	QualityAI	None confirmed	2	1000 or more people	0
23	QualityKiosk Technologies	None confirmed	5	1000 or more people	0
24	Testhouse	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1	ScienceSoft	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	85
25	Testlio	None confirmed	5	51-200 people	76
26	Global App Testing	ISO/IEC 27001register entry	4	51-200 people	66
27	Edgescan	ISO/IEC 27001register entryCRESTregister entry	1	51-200 people	53
3	DeviQA	None confirmed	5	201-500 people	44
4	QA Madness	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	44
28	BreachLock	CRESTregister entry	Not published	51-200 people	40
29	Applause	None confirmed	3	201-500 people	39
30	TestFort	None confirmed	5	51-200 people	32
31	UNGUESS	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entry	1	51-200 people	27
8	Luxe Quality	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	21
10	a1qa	None confirmed	3	1000 or more people	20
32	QATestLab	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	17
12	QAwerk	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	13
14	Savarian.tech	None confirmed	3	11-50 people	8
33	QA Mentor	None confirmed	Not published	201-500 people	7
18	Codoid	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	5
34	Soflab Technology	None confirmed	1	51-200 people	3
20	BetterQA	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry	4	11-50 people	0
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
1	ScienceSoft	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	85
27	Edgescan	ISO/IEC 27001register entryCRESTregister entry	1	51-200 people	53
3	DeviQA	None confirmed	5	201-500 people	44
4	QA Madness	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	44
35	Qualysec	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	31
32	QATestLab	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	17
12	QAwerk	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	13
20	BetterQA	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry	4	11-50 people	0
36	Bishop Fox	CRESTregister entry	5	201-500 people	0
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
5	QualityLogic	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	37
30	TestFort	None confirmed	5	51-200 people	32
6	BugRaptors	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	26
7	Abstracta	None confirmed	4	51-200 people	24
32	QATestLab	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	17
37	PFLB	None confirmed	5	51-200 people	6
34	Soflab Technology	None confirmed	1	51-200 people	3
38	MuukTest	None confirmed	5	11-50 people	0
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
3	DeviQA	None confirmed	5	201-500 people	44
4	QA Madness	None confirmed	2	51-200 people	44
30	TestFort	None confirmed	5	51-200 people	32
10	a1qa	None confirmed	3	1000 or more people	20
12	QAwerk	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	13
13	QAble	None confirmed	4	51-200 people	8
21	ImpactQA	None confirmed	5	201-500 people	0
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
1	ScienceSoft	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	85
39	Packetlabs	CRESTregister entry	Not published	51-200 people	72
7	Abstracta	None confirmed	4	51-200 people	24
9	QAlified	None confirmed	5	11-50 people	21
10	a1qa	None confirmed	3	1000 or more people	20
17	Sofka Technologies	None confirmed	1	501-1000 people	7
19	Software Testing Bureau	None confirmed	1	11-50 people	1
Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
26	Global App Testing	ISO/IEC 27001register entry	4	51-200 people	66
29	Applause	None confirmed	3	201-500 people	39
31	UNGUESS	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entry	1	51-200 people	27
40	Ubertesters	None confirmed	1	51-200 people	7
41	Digivante	None confirmed	4	11-50 people	0
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
3	DeviQA	None confirmed	5	201-500 people	44
5	QualityLogic	None confirmed	3	51-200 people	37
32	QATestLab	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	17
40	Ubertesters	None confirmed	1	51-200 people	7
Accessibility specialists Accessibility testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports an accessibility conformance metric.
42	Vervali Systems	None confirmed	1	51-200 people	11
Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
32	QATestLab	None confirmed	2	501-1000 people	17
Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.
20	BetterQA	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry	4	11-50 people	0
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
43	Kualitatem	TMMiregister entry	Not published	51-200 people	9
44	Lotus Quality Assurance	None confirmed	Not published	201-500 people	9
45	Testrig Technologies	None confirmed	Not published	51-200 people	7
46	iBeta Quality Assurance	ISO/IEC 17025expired September 30, 2023	1	51-200 people	4
47	Bugcrowd	CRESTregister entryFedRAMPregister entryCSA STARregister entry	2	201-500 people	0
48	Bugwolf	None confirmed	Not published	11-50 people	0
49	Testbytes	None confirmed	Not published	51-200 people	0
50	TestVagrant	None confirmed	Not published	51-200 people	0
51	Zoonou	CRESTregister entry	Not published	11-50 people	0

What changed since

Entered the list since this snapshot: berezha-security-group, iterasec, white-test-lab, ask-your-qa, andagon, appmatics, devoteam-cyber-trust, ethiack, euro-testing, qavalue, tarlogic, ilovemyqa, cystack, plus-qa, indium-software, coderio, halo-security, testriq, pointwest, qualizeal, testingxperts, vsec.
Left the list since this snapshot: none.
Changed position: Testlio from 25 to 2, Global App Testing from 26 to 3, Edgescan from 27 to 4, DeviQA from 3 to 5, QA Madness from 4 to 6, BreachLock from 28 to 8, Applause from 29 to 9, TestFort from 30 to 10, UNGUESS from 31 to 11, Luxe Quality from 8 to 12, a1qa from 10 to 13, QATestLab from 32 to 15, QAwerk from 12 to 17, Savarian.tech from 14 to 18, QA Mentor from 33 to 20, Codoid from 18 to 21, Soflab Technology from 34 to 22, BetterQA from 20 to 25, QA Wolf from 2 to 31, QualityLogic from 5 to 32, BugRaptors from 6 to 33, Abstracta from 7 to 34, QAlified from 9 to 35, OnPath Testing from 11 to 36, QAble from 13 to 37, Frugal Testing from 15 to 38, Moolya from 16 to 39, Sofka Technologies from 17 to 40, Software Testing Bureau from 19 to 41, ImpactQA from 21 to 42, QualityAI from 22 to 43, QualityKiosk Technologies from 23 to 44, Testhouse from 24 to 45, Ubertesters from 40 to 46, Packetlabs from 39 to 47, Qualysec from 35 to 50, Bishop Fox from 36 to 51, PFLB from 37 to 52, MuukTest from 38 to 53, Digivante from 41 to 54, Vervali Systems from 42 to 56, Kualitatem from 43 to 59, Lotus Quality Assurance from 44 to 60, Testrig Technologies from 45 to 62, iBeta Quality Assurance from 46 to 64, Bugcrowd from 47 to 65, Bugwolf from 48 to 66, Testbytes from 49 to 69, TestVagrant from 50 to 71, Zoonou from 51 to 73.

Every change of composition and order between versions is recorded in the changelog.

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.