This is the 2026 version of this list, taken on 2026-09-03. The current version is at Industry: Fintech.
Fintech QA companies in 2026
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
The companies, as of 2026-09-03
| # | Company | Certificates | Delivery locations | Published rates | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | None confirmed | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 85 |
| 2 | Global App Testing | ISO/IEC 27001register entry | the UK, Romania | Not published | 66 |
| 3 | DeviQA | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 5 | TestFort | None confirmed | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 32 |
| 6 | Sekurno | None confirmed | Estonia, the Netherlands |
| 26 |
| 7 | QATestLab | None confirmed | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 17 |
| 8 | QAwerk | None confirmed | Ukraine |
| 13 |
| 9 | Soflab Technology | None confirmed | Poland |
| 3 |
| 10 | BetterQA | ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry | Romania | Not published | 0 |
| Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | None confirmed | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 85 |
| 3 | DeviQA | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 11 | QualityLogic | None confirmed | the USA |
| 37 |
| 8 | QAwerk | None confirmed | Ukraine |
| 13 |
| 12 | Frugal Testing | None confirmed | India, the USA |
| 7 |
| 13 | Moolya | None confirmed | India, the USA |
| 7 |
| 10 | BetterQA | ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry | Romania | Not published | 0 |
| Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | None confirmed | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 85 |
| 3 | DeviQA | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 14 | Qualysec | None confirmed | India |
| 31 |
| 7 | QATestLab | None confirmed | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 17 |
| 8 | QAwerk | None confirmed | Ukraine |
| 13 |
| 10 | BetterQA | ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry | Romania | Not published | 0 |
| Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source. | |||||
| 3 | DeviQA | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 11 | QualityLogic | None confirmed | the USA |
| 37 |
| 7 | QATestLab | None confirmed | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 17 |
| 15 | Ubertesters | None confirmed | the USA |
| 7 |
| Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 3 | DeviQA | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | None confirmed | Poland |
| 44 |
| 5 | TestFort | None confirmed | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 32 |
| 8 | QAwerk | None confirmed | Ukraine |
| 13 |
| Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric. | |||||
| 11 | QualityLogic | None confirmed | the USA |
| 37 |
| 5 | TestFort | None confirmed | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 32 |
| 7 | QATestLab | None confirmed | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 17 |
| 9 | Soflab Technology | None confirmed | Poland |
| 3 |
| Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source. | |||||
| 2 | Global App Testing | ISO/IEC 27001register entry | the UK, Romania | Not published | 66 |
| 15 | Ubertesters | None confirmed | the USA |
| 7 |
| 16 | Digivante | None confirmed | the UK | Not published | 0 |
| Accessibility specialists Accessibility testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports an accessibility conformance metric. | |||||
| 17 | Vervali Systems | None confirmed | India, the UAE, New Zealand |
| 11 |
| Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source. | |||||
| 7 | QATestLab | None confirmed | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 17 |
| Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | None confirmed | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 85 |
| Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001. | |||||
| 10 | BetterQA | ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry | Romania | Not published | 0 |
| Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles. | |||||
| 18 | iBeta Quality Assurance | ISO/IEC 17025expired September 30, 2023 | the USA |
| 4 |
| 19 | TestVagrant | None confirmed | India, the USA, Singapore, Australia | Not published | 0 |
What changed since
- Entered the list since this snapshot: berezha-security-group, iterasec, sepp-med, cystack, testlauncher, testriq.
- Left the list since this snapshot: none.
- Changed position: TestFort from 5 to 6, Sekurno from 6 to 7, QATestLab from 7 to 9, QAwerk from 8 to 10, Soflab Technology from 9 to 11, BetterQA from 10 to 12, QualityLogic from 11 to 14, Frugal Testing from 12 to 15, Moolya from 13 to 16, Qualysec from 14 to 17, Ubertesters from 15 to 18, Digivante from 16 to 19, Vervali Systems from 17 to 22, iBeta Quality Assurance from 18 to 24, TestVagrant from 19 to 25.
Every change of composition and order between versions is recorded in the changelog.
Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.