QA Rating

This is the 2026 version of this list, taken on 2026-09-03. The current version is at Industry: Games.

Games QA companies in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

This is the 2026 state of the list, taken on September 3, 2026, with 26 companies. Since then 7 entered the list and 0 left it, and 24 changed position. Field values on this page are the ones recorded at the time of the snapshot.
26 companies in this version. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies, as of 2026-09-03

Games: 26 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#CompanyCertificatesCase studiesTeam sizeReviews
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1Global App TestingISO/IEC 27001register entry451-200 people66
2QA MadnessNone confirmed251-200 people44
3ApplauseNone confirmed3201-500 people39
4TestFortNone confirmed551-200 people32
5UNGUESSISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entry151-200 people27
6a1qaNone confirmed31000 or more people20
7QATestLabNone confirmed2501-1000 people17
8QAwerkNone confirmed351-200 people13
9SnoopGameNone confirmed351-200 people9
10QA MentorNone confirmedNot published201-500 people7
11CodoidNone confirmed251-200 people5
12PlaytestCloudNone confirmed3201-500 people2
13GlobalStepNone confirmedNot published1000 or more people0
14SideISO/IEC 27001register entryNot published1000 or more people0
15TestronicNone confirmedNot published1000 or more people0
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
16QA WolfNone confirmed351-200 people65
2QA MadnessNone confirmed251-200 people44
17BugRaptorsNone confirmed2501-1000 people26
6a1qaNone confirmed31000 or more people20
8QAwerkNone confirmed351-200 people13
18QAbleNone confirmed451-200 people8
19MoolyaNone confirmed4501-1000 people7
11CodoidNone confirmed251-200 people5
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
2QA MadnessNone confirmed251-200 people44
4TestFortNone confirmed551-200 people32
6a1qaNone confirmed31000 or more people20
8QAwerkNone confirmed351-200 people13
9SnoopGameNone confirmed351-200 people9
18QAbleNone confirmed451-200 people8
Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
1Global App TestingISO/IEC 27001register entry451-200 people66
3ApplauseNone confirmed3201-500 people39
5UNGUESSISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entry151-200 people27
20UbertestersNone confirmed151-200 people7
21DigivanteNone confirmed411-50 people0
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
7QATestLabNone confirmed2501-1000 people17
9SnoopGameNone confirmed351-200 people9
20UbertestersNone confirmed151-200 people7
22iXie GamingNone confirmed3501-1000 people3
23Latis GlobalNone confirmedNot published51-200 people0
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
24PacketlabsCRESTregister entryNot published51-200 people72
6a1qaNone confirmed31000 or more people20
9SnoopGameNone confirmed351-200 people9
13GlobalStepNone confirmedNot published1000 or more people0
14SideISO/IEC 27001register entryNot published1000 or more people0
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
4TestFortNone confirmed551-200 people32
17BugRaptorsNone confirmed2501-1000 people26
7QATestLabNone confirmed2501-1000 people17
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
2QA MadnessNone confirmed251-200 people44
7QATestLabNone confirmed2501-1000 people17
8QAwerkNone confirmed351-200 people13
Enterprises A verified ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 certificate, a team size of 201-500 or larger, and at least one named client that is a publicly traded company, each with a source.
14SideISO/IEC 27001register entryNot published1000 or more people0
Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
7QATestLabNone confirmed2501-1000 people17
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
25Lotus Quality AssuranceNone confirmedNot published201-500 people9
26TestbytesNone confirmedNot published51-200 people0

What changed since

  • Entered the list since this snapshot: berezha-security-group, plato-testing, testlauncher, cheq-systems, indium-software, testriq, rtts.
  • Left the list since this snapshot: none.
  • Changed position: Applause from 3 to 4, TestFort from 4 to 5, UNGUESS from 5 to 6, a1qa from 6 to 7, QATestLab from 7 to 8, QAwerk from 8 to 9, SnoopGame from 9 to 10, QA Mentor from 10 to 11, Codoid from 11 to 12, PlaytestCloud from 12 to 13, GlobalStep from 13 to 14, Side from 14 to 15, Testronic from 15 to 16, QA Wolf from 16 to 17, BugRaptors from 17 to 18, QAble from 18 to 19, Moolya from 19 to 20, Ubertesters from 20 to 21, Packetlabs from 24 to 22, Digivante from 21 to 25, iXie Gaming from 22 to 26, Latis Global from 23 to 27, Lotus Quality Assurance from 25 to 30, Testbytes from 26 to 33.

Every change of composition and order between versions is recorded in the changelog.

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.