Applause runs engagements only as crowdtesting or managed testing, with no staff augmentation and no dedicated team on offer. What other ways of structuring the work does a buyer find among vendors offering similar testing services?

A dedicated team is available from three vendors, and staff augmentation from two, covering the two structures Applause does not offer. Project based work and continuous testing each appear on two profiles, and on demand testing appears on one. A buyer who needs staff embedded inside an existing team, instead of work run as a managed service or through a crowd, has more than one profile to compare, though none of them carries Applause's own two-model setup.

Applause names no automation framework in its published profile. When vendors do publish their framework lists, how much overlap tends to show up between them?

Selenium and Appium are the only two tool names that show up on every published framework list among these vendors. Four more names, Cypress, Playwright, k6 and JMeter, each turn up on exactly two of the three lists, and five names appear on one list each, among them REST Assured, SoapUI, Postman, Robot Framework and WebdriverIO. The field records that a company names a tool, and nothing about how much of its work runs on that tool. Applause publishes no list of its own to set against any of these.

Applause publishes no minimum project size. Where do the floors among the alternatives sit?

Published floors run between $1,000 and $75,000. Five of the eight vendors publish a floor: one sets it at $1,000, two at $5,000, one at $10,000 and one at $75,000, so the highest floor is seventy-five times the lowest. The other three publish none, the same blank Applause carries. A floor is the smallest engagement a company says it will accept, so a buyer with a small first project can rule five of these profiles in or out before a conversation and has nothing published to weigh the remaining three against.

Applause alternatives

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

Applause declares 10 services in this catalog, among them Manual testing, Test automation, Payment flow testing. Applause names 8 industries, among them Automotive, Ecommerce, Media. Across the review platforms this catalog reads, Applause has 39 verified reviews, and that count is what puts it among the companies people search alternatives for.

8 companies compared against Applause.

Where these companies differ from Applause

This catalog does not know why a reader is looking for a replacement, and it does not guess. The list below is the set of fields on which the companies on this page actually differ from Applause.

Delivery geography: 6 of the 8 candidates deliver from at least one country Applause does not list.
Certifications: 3 of the 8 candidates hold a confirmed certification that Applause does not.
Published rates: 4 of the 8 candidates publish an hourly rate. Applause publishes none, so this page cannot compare price.
Applicability conditions the subject does not meet: Candidates on this page meet conditions Applause does not, among them Security focus, Automation first, Embedded team model.
Published case studies: 7 of the 8 candidates publish at least one case study with a named metric, and Applause publishes 3.

The companies

A company is listed here when it meets at least one of the same applicability conditions as the company at the top of the page. Those conditions are computed from published fields, so the list changes when the fields change and never because somebody paid for a place in it.

Global App Testing
Crowdtesting at scale Nearshore for the EU
Global App Testing meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Applause, among them Crowdtesting at scale and Nearshore for the EU, declares 5 of the services Applause declares, among them Manual testing and Usability testing, names Telecom and Games among its industries, and carries 66 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.
UNGUESS
Crowdtesting at scale Nearshore for the EU
UNGUESS meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Applause, among them Crowdtesting at scale and Nearshore for the EU, declares 6 of the services Applause declares, among them Manual testing and Test automation, names Games and Ecommerce among its industries, and carries 27 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.
Beta Family
Crowdtesting at scale Nearshore for the EU
Beta Family meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Applause, among them Crowdtesting at scale and Nearshore for the EU, and carries 2 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.
ScienceSoft
Nearshore for the EU
ScienceSoft meets the same applicability condition as Applause, Nearshore for the EU, declares 7 of the services Applause declares, among them Manual testing and Localization testing, names Healthcare and Banking among its industries, and carries 85 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.
Testlio
Nearshore for the EU
Testlio meets the same applicability condition as Applause, Nearshore for the EU, declares 6 of the services Applause declares, among them Manual testing and Payment flow testing, names Ecommerce and Banking among its industries, and carries 76 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.
Edgescan
Nearshore for the EU
Edgescan meets the same applicability condition as Applause, Nearshore for the EU, declares 1 of the services Applause declares, among them Security testing, names Banking and Healthcare among its industries, and carries 53 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.
DeviQA
Nearshore for the EU
DeviQA meets the same applicability condition as Applause, Nearshore for the EU, declares 6 of the services Applause declares, among them Test automation and Manual testing, names Healthcare and Banking among its industries, and carries 44 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.
QA Madness
Nearshore for the EU
QA Madness meets the same applicability condition as Applause, Nearshore for the EU, declares 6 of the services Applause declares, among them Manual testing and Test automation, names Ecommerce and Healthcare among its industries, and carries 44 verified reviews against 39 for Applause.

Field by field

The order is by the number of applicability conditions a company shares with the company at the top of the page, then by the number of verified reviews it has on external review platforms, then alphabetically by name. No position here is paid for and none of it is an editorial score.

Applause and the 8 companies this catalog lists as alternatives, on the fields it publishes for every company.
Company	Delivery locations	Published rates	Team size	Certificates	Case studies	Reviews
ApplauseThe company this page compares against	the USA, Germany, Israel, Poland, India	Not published	201-500 people	None confirmed	3	39
Global App Testing	the UK, Romania	Not published	51-200 people	ISO/IEC 27001register entry	4	66
UNGUESS	Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK	Not published	51-200 people	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entry	1	27
Beta Family	Sweden	Not published	1-10 people	None confirmed	Not published	2
ScienceSoft	the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	None confirmed	2	85
Testlio	the USA, Estonia	Blended $25-49/hgoodfirms.co	51-200 people	None confirmed	5	76
Edgescan	Ireland, the USA	Not published	51-200 people	ISO/IEC 27001register entryCRESTregister entry	1	53
DeviQA	Poland	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	201-500 people	None confirmed	5	44
QA Madness	Poland	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	None confirmed	2	44

No company in this table has a value recorded for these fields: Onboarding. Those cells are empty because no source recorded the value, and an empty cell is not a statement that the company lacks the property.

Where the crowd pool sets this profile apart

Applause declares two engagement models, crowdtesting and managed testing. The number that sets it apart from most other companies in this catalog is a published crowd tester pool of 1,500,000 people. Applause's profile also records a separate field for the staff who run the platform and support engagements, distinct from the external pool the company draws on for a project. Reading the smaller field as a ceiling on the pool, or the pool as a description of in-house capacity, misreads what each field records.

A pool size only reads against another pool size

Three of the eight candidates on this page publish the same kind of figure, each of the four taken from the company's own site: Global App Testing lists 145,035 testers, Beta Family lists 1,028,000, and UNGUESS lists 60,000. Set beside those three, the Applause pool is the largest figure on the page and 25 times the UNGUESS figure. The other five candidates, ScienceSoft, Edgescan, DeviQA, QA Madness and Testlio, publish no pool figure at all. A pool size for Applause can only be set against the three candidates that publish one; the other five leave nothing on this page to compare it with.

What the total does not say

None of the four published pool figures states how many of those testers are available on a given language, device or operating system when a project runs. Applause's own case material gives one concrete look at that gap: the ASICS Runkeeper engagement drew 400 community testers who completed test runs in more than 60 countries and worked with native speakers in 9 languages beyond English, a fraction of the pool figure the company publishes elsewhere. The same limit applies to the other three crowdtesting candidates. A published total for any of the three confirms that a pool exists. It does not state what part of that pool is reachable for a given language, device or release window.

A pool figure published on a thin profile

Beta Family is the clearest case of a pool figure standing on its own. Its published profile is 43% complete: its services, industries, frameworks and client stage fields are all empty. It still publishes the second-largest crowd tester pool on this page. A buyer comparing Applause to Beta Family on pool size alone would be comparing the one number both companies chose to publish, with nothing else in either profile to check it against.

Side by side with Applause

Questions

Applause runs engagements only as crowdtesting or managed testing, with no staff augmentation and no dedicated team on offer. What other ways of structuring the work does a buyer find among vendors offering similar testing services?: A dedicated team is available from three vendors, and staff augmentation from two, covering the two structures Applause does not offer. Project based work and continuous testing each appear on two profiles, and on demand testing appears on one. A buyer who needs staff embedded inside an existing team, instead of work run as a managed service or through a crowd, has more than one profile to compare, though none of them carries Applause's own two-model setup.
Applause names no automation framework in its published profile. When vendors do publish their framework lists, how much overlap tends to show up between them?: Selenium and Appium are the only two tool names that show up on every published framework list among these vendors. Four more names, Cypress, Playwright, k6 and JMeter, each turn up on exactly two of the three lists, and five names appear on one list each, among them REST Assured, SoapUI, Postman, Robot Framework and WebdriverIO. The field records that a company names a tool, and nothing about how much of its work runs on that tool. Applause publishes no list of its own to set against any of these.
Applause publishes no minimum project size. Where do the floors among the alternatives sit?: Published floors run between $1,000 and $75,000. Five of the eight vendors publish a floor: one sets it at $1,000, two at $5,000, one at $10,000 and one at $75,000, so the highest floor is seventy-five times the lowest. The other three publish none, the same blank Applause carries. A floor is the smallest engagement a company says it will accept, so a buyer with a small first project can rule five of these profiles in or out before a conversation and has nothing published to weigh the remaining three against.

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

The rule behind this list and the basis of its order are on the methodology page. Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.