We are a telecom operator. Do the alternatives work in our sector at all?

Telecom appears on a single industry list out of the eight alternatives. That same alternative is also the only one whose list carries all four of the sectors Edgescan names. Healthcare appears on seven of the eight lists. Ecommerce appears on seven of the eight as well. Banking appears on five of the eight. The sector that brought a telecom buyer to a security vendor is the one sector almost none of the alternatives publishes.

Our procurement screens out vendors owned by a parent company. How many alternatives does that rule remove?

All eight alternatives carry an independent ownership classification, and so does Edgescan, which leaves this field separating nobody from anybody. The classification is read from a published source rather than assumed: a structure with no source behind it is left blank instead of being filled in as independent. A blank would therefore be the interesting case here, and none of the nine profiles has one.

We buy testing as a rolling subscription today. What changes in the contract if we move to a dedicated team or a managed testing service?

Who owns the test process changes, and so does what the money buys. A continuous testing program is defined in this catalog as an ongoing program with rolling coverage, as opposed to a point-in-time engagement that ends with a report. On-demand testing is defined as test cycles booked per release or per sprint without a standing team. Those are the two Edgescan publishes. A managed testing service means the vendor owns the test process and reports against agreed service levels. A dedicated team means a named team works only for one client, with its own lead, on a rolling contract, which is a staffing commitment rather than a coverage commitment.

Edgescan alternatives

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

Edgescan declares 3 services in this catalog, among them Penetration testing, Security testing, Attack surface management. Edgescan names 4 industries, among them Banking, Healthcare, Ecommerce. Across the review platforms this catalog reads, Edgescan has 53 verified reviews, and that count is what puts it among the companies people search alternatives for. Certifications confirmed for Edgescan: iso27001, crest.

8 companies compared against Edgescan.

Where these companies differ from Edgescan

This catalog does not know why a reader is looking for a replacement, and it does not guess. The list below is the set of fields on which the companies on this page actually differ from Edgescan.

Delivery geography: 8 of the 8 candidates deliver from at least one country Edgescan does not list.
Certifications: 1 of the 8 candidates hold a confirmed certification that Edgescan does not.
Published rates: 6 of the 8 candidates publish an hourly rate. Edgescan publishes none, so this page cannot compare price.
Applicability conditions the subject does not meet: Candidates on this page meet conditions Edgescan does not, among them Automation first, Embedded team model, Device lab coverage.
Published case studies: 8 of the 8 candidates publish at least one case study with a named metric, and Edgescan publishes 1.

The companies

A company is listed here when it meets at least one of the same applicability conditions as the company at the top of the page. Those conditions are computed from published fields, so the list changes when the fields change and never because somebody paid for a place in it.

ScienceSoft
Security focus Nearshore for the EU
ScienceSoft meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Edgescan, among them Security focus and Nearshore for the EU, declares 2 of the services Edgescan declares, among them Security testing and Penetration testing, names Healthcare and Banking among its industries, and carries 85 verified reviews against 53 for Edgescan.
DeviQA
Security focus Nearshore for the EU
DeviQA meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Edgescan, among them Security focus and Nearshore for the EU, declares 2 of the services Edgescan declares, among them Security testing and Penetration testing, names Healthcare and Banking among its industries, and carries 44 verified reviews against 53 for Edgescan.
QA Madness
Security focus Nearshore for the EU
QA Madness meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Edgescan, among them Security focus and Nearshore for the EU, declares 2 of the services Edgescan declares, among them Security testing and Penetration testing, names Ecommerce and Healthcare among its industries, and carries 44 verified reviews against 53 for Edgescan.
QATestLab
Security focus Nearshore for the EU
QATestLab meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Edgescan, among them Security focus and Nearshore for the EU, declares 2 of the services Edgescan declares, among them Penetration testing and Security testing, names Ecommerce and Healthcare among its industries, and carries 17 verified reviews against 53 for Edgescan.
QAwerk
Security focus Nearshore for the EU
QAwerk meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Edgescan, among them Security focus and Nearshore for the EU, declares 2 of the services Edgescan declares, among them Penetration testing and Security testing, names Ecommerce and Healthcare among its industries, and carries 13 verified reviews against 53 for Edgescan.
BetterQA
Security focus Nearshore for the EU
BetterQA meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Edgescan, among them Security focus and Nearshore for the EU, declares 1 of the services Edgescan declares, among them Security testing, names Healthcare and Banking among its industries, and carries no verified reviews on the platforms this catalog reads.
Cobalt
Security focus Nearshore for the EU
Cobalt meets 2 of the same applicability conditions as Edgescan, among them Security focus and Nearshore for the EU, declares 2 of the services Edgescan declares, among them Penetration testing and Security testing, names Banking and Healthcare among its industries, and carries no verified reviews on the platforms this catalog reads.
Testlio
Nearshore for the EU
Testlio meets the same applicability condition as Edgescan, Nearshore for the EU, names Ecommerce and Banking among its industries, and carries 76 verified reviews against 53 for Edgescan.

Field by field

The order is by the number of applicability conditions a company shares with the company at the top of the page, then by the number of verified reviews it has on external review platforms, then alphabetically by name. No position here is paid for and none of it is an editorial score.

Edgescan and the 8 companies this catalog lists as alternatives, on the fields it publishes for every company.
Company	Delivery locations	Published rates	Team size	Certificates	Case studies	Reviews
EdgescanThe company this page compares against	Ireland, the USA	Not published	51-200 people	ISO/IEC 27001register entryCRESTregister entry	1	53
ScienceSoft	the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	None confirmed	2	85
DeviQA	Poland	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	201-500 people	None confirmed	5	44
QA Madness	Poland	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	None confirmed	2	44
QATestLab	Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	None confirmed	2	17
QAwerk	Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	None confirmed	3	13
BetterQA	Romania	Not published	11-50 people	ISO/IEC 27001register entryISO 9001register entryISO 13485register entry	4	0
Cobalt	the USA, Germany, the UK	Not published	201-500 people	CRESTregister entry	2	0
Testlio	the USA, Estonia	Blended $25-49/hgoodfirms.co	51-200 people	None confirmed	5	76

Narrowing from three declared services to a wider vendor list

Edgescan declares three services: penetration testing, security testing and attack surface management. None of the eight candidates on this page declare attack surface management by name, so a switch to any of them drops that specific line from the declared list even where other security services remain. The narrowest of the eight is Cobalt, which declares four services: penetration testing, secure code review, red teaming and security testing. Testlio declares seven, none of them security-related: manual testing, payment flow testing, AI system testing, accessibility testing, localization testing, usability testing and mobile app testing. The remaining six candidates declare between eight and fifteen services each, mixing security disciplines with manual, localization, usability and accessibility testing. No candidate here matches all three of Edgescan's declared services; the closest overlap on this page is two of three, shared by ScienceSoft, DeviQA, QA Madness, QATestLab, QAwerk and Cobalt, each declaring penetration testing and security testing alongside a wider list.

Engagement models, minimum project size and data processing terms

Edgescan lists two engagement models: a continuous testing program and on-demand testing. It does not publish a minimum project size. Six of the eight candidates on this page publish at least one engagement model of their own, and six publish a minimum project size, a figure that ranges from 1,000 USD to 75,000 USD across those six. Edgescan confirms a GDPR data processing agreement; it does not confirm signing a business associate agreement. Only one of the eight candidates confirms the same GDPR commitment, and none of the nine companies on this page confirms signing a business associate agreement.

What the closest candidate's case studies measure

Cobalt, the candidate closest to Edgescan by declared service count, shares Edgescan's continuous testing program and on-demand testing engagement models, and adds a third, managed testing service, that Edgescan does not list. The two companies' published case studies measure different things. Edgescan's case study reports 233 high-risk issues found in the first seven days of an engagement with a telecom sector client, a volume measured against a fixed time window. Cobalt's case studies report change over time instead: a 50% reduction in pentest preparation, staging and remediation time paired with a 20% cost saving against the client's top three previous vendors in one engagement, and a 70% decrease in remediation time in another. A buyer comparing the two is comparing a point-in-time issue count with a pair of before-and-after percentage changes, a different kind of measurement in each case.

A field that stays empty only for Edgescan

Edgescan names zero clients in its profile; its published case study identifies the client only by industry, as "A U.S.-Based Telecom Manufacturer and Operator." Every one of the eight candidates names at least one client: QA Madness names one, QATestLab and QAwerk name three each, ScienceSoft names four, DeviQA and Testlio name five each, Cobalt names fifteen, and BetterQA names twenty-seven. A procurement process that requires a named reference account before shortlisting finds that record at all eight candidates and at none of Edgescan's own published fields.

Side by side with Edgescan

Questions

We are a telecom operator. Do the alternatives work in our sector at all?: Telecom appears on a single industry list out of the eight alternatives. That same alternative is also the only one whose list carries all four of the sectors Edgescan names. Healthcare appears on seven of the eight lists. Ecommerce appears on seven of the eight as well. Banking appears on five of the eight. The sector that brought a telecom buyer to a security vendor is the one sector almost none of the alternatives publishes.
Our procurement screens out vendors owned by a parent company. How many alternatives does that rule remove?: All eight alternatives carry an independent ownership classification, and so does Edgescan, which leaves this field separating nobody from anybody. The classification is read from a published source rather than assumed: a structure with no source behind it is left blank instead of being filled in as independent. A blank would therefore be the interesting case here, and none of the nine profiles has one.
We buy testing as a rolling subscription today. What changes in the contract if we move to a dedicated team or a managed testing service?: Who owns the test process changes, and so does what the money buys. A continuous testing program is defined in this catalog as an ongoing program with rolling coverage, as opposed to a point-in-time engagement that ends with a report. On-demand testing is defined as test cycles booked per release or per sprint without a standing team. Those are the two Edgescan publishes. A managed testing service means the vendor owns the test process and reports against agreed service levels. A dedicated team means a named team works only for one client, with its own lead, on a rolling contract, which is a staffing commitment rather than a coverage commitment.

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

The rule behind this list and the basis of its order are on the methodology page. Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.