This is the 2026 version of this list, taken on 2026-09-03. The current version is at Framework and stack: Appium.
Appium QA companies in 2026
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
This is the 2026 state of the list, taken on September 3, 2026, with 21 companies. Since then 8 entered the list and 0 left it, and 10 changed position. Field values on this page are the ones recorded at the time of the snapshot.
21 companies in this version. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.
The companies, as of 2026-09-03
| # | Company | Case studies | Published rates | Team size | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 2 | QA Wolf | 3 | Not published | 51-200 people | 65 |
| 3 | DeviQA | 5 |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | 2 |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 5 | QualityLogic | 3 |
| 51-200 people | 37 |
| 6 | QASource | 1 |
| 1000 or more people | 29 |
| 7 | Abstracta | 4 |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 8 | Luxe Quality | 2 |
| 51-200 people | 21 |
| 9 | a1qa | 3 |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 10 | QAwerk | 3 |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 11 | QAble | 4 |
| 51-200 people | 8 |
| 12 | BetterQA | 4 | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 3 | DeviQA | 5 |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | 2 |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 13 | TestFort | 5 |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 8 | Luxe Quality | 2 |
| 51-200 people | 21 |
| 9 | a1qa | 3 |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 14 | QATestLab | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 10 | QAwerk | 3 |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 12 | BetterQA | 4 | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 3 | DeviQA | 5 |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | 2 |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 13 | TestFort | 5 |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 9 | a1qa | 3 |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 10 | QAwerk | 3 |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 11 | QAble | 4 |
| 51-200 people | 8 |
| Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric. | |||||
| 5 | QualityLogic | 3 |
| 51-200 people | 37 |
| 13 | TestFort | 5 |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 6 | QASource | 1 |
| 1000 or more people | 29 |
| 7 | Abstracta | 4 |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 14 | QATestLab | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 15 | MuukTest | 5 | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 3 | DeviQA | 5 |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 4 | QA Madness | 2 |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 14 | QATestLab | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 10 | QAwerk | 3 |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 12 | BetterQA | 4 | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source. | |||||
| 3 | DeviQA | 5 |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 5 | QualityLogic | 3 |
| 51-200 people | 37 |
| 14 | QATestLab | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 16 | iXie Gaming | 3 |
| 501-1000 people | 3 |
| Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 6 | QASource | 1 |
| 1000 or more people | 29 |
| 7 | Abstracta | 4 |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 9 | a1qa | 3 |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source. | |||||
| 14 | QATestLab | 2 |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001. | |||||
| 12 | BetterQA | 4 | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles. | |||||
| 17 | Lotus Quality Assurance | Not published | Not published | 201-500 people | 9 |
| 18 | Testrig Technologies | Not published |
| 51-200 people | 7 |
| 19 | iBeta Quality Assurance | 1 |
| 51-200 people | 4 |
| 20 | Testbytes | Not published |
| 51-200 people | 0 |
| 21 | TestVagrant | Not published | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
What changed since
- Entered the list since this snapshot: appmatics, ask-your-qa, qavalue, plus-qa, ilovemyqa, cheq-systems, coderio, testriq.
- Left the list since this snapshot: none.
- Changed position: BetterQA from 12 to 13, TestFort from 13 to 14, QATestLab from 14 to 15, MuukTest from 15 to 18, iXie Gaming from 16 to 20, Lotus Quality Assurance from 17 to 24, Testrig Technologies from 18 to 25, iBeta Quality Assurance from 19 to 27, Testbytes from 20 to 28, TestVagrant from 21 to 29.
Every change of composition and order between versions is recorded in the changelog.
Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.