QA Rating

This is the 2026 version of this list, taken on 2026-09-03. The current version is at Framework and stack: Cypress.

Cypress QA companies in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

This is the 2026 state of the list, taken on September 3, 2026, with 13 companies. Since then 6 entered the list and 0 left it, and 4 changed position. Field values on this page are the ones recorded at the time of the snapshot.
13 companies in this version. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies, as of 2026-09-03

Cypress: 13 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#CompanyCase studiesPublished ratesTeam sizeReviews
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
1DeviQA5201-500 people44
2QA Madness251-200 people44
3QualityLogic351-200 people37
4QASource11000 or more people29
5BugRaptors2501-1000 people26
6Luxe Quality251-200 people21
7a1qa31000 or more people20
8OnPath Testing311-50 people17
9QAble451-200 people8
10BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1DeviQA5201-500 people44
2QA Madness251-200 people44
6Luxe Quality251-200 people21
7a1qa31000 or more people20
10BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
1DeviQA5201-500 people44
2QA Madness251-200 people44
7a1qa31000 or more people20
9QAble451-200 people8
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
3QualityLogic351-200 people37
4QASource11000 or more people29
5BugRaptors2501-1000 people26
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
1DeviQA5201-500 people44
2QA Madness251-200 people44
10BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
1DeviQA5201-500 people44
3QualityLogic351-200 people37
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
4QASource11000 or more people29
7a1qa31000 or more people20
Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.
10BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
11Lotus Quality AssuranceNot publishedNot published201-500 people9
12Testrig TechnologiesNot published51-200 people7
13iBeta Quality Assurance151-200 people4

What changed since

  • Entered the list since this snapshot: appmatics, ask-your-qa, qytera, ilovemyqa, cheq-systems, coderio.
  • Left the list since this snapshot: none.
  • Changed position: BetterQA from 10 to 11, Lotus Quality Assurance from 11 to 17, Testrig Technologies from 12 to 18, iBeta Quality Assurance from 13 to 19.

Every change of composition and order between versions is recorded in the changelog.

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.