QA Rating

This is the 2026 version of this list, taken on 2026-09-03. The current version is at Framework and stack: Apache JMeter.

Apache JMeter QA companies in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

This is the 2026 state of the list, taken on September 3, 2026, with 14 companies. Since then 5 entered the list and 0 left it, and 5 changed position. Field values on this page are the ones recorded at the time of the snapshot.
14 companies in this version. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies, as of 2026-09-03

Apache JMeter: 14 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#CompanyCase studiesPublished ratesTeam sizeReviews
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
1ScienceSoft2501-1000 people85
2QA Madness251-200 people44
3QASource11000 or more people29
4a1qa31000 or more people20
5OnPath Testing311-50 people17
6QAble451-200 people8
7Frugal Testing151-200 people7
8BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1ScienceSoft2501-1000 people85
2QA Madness251-200 people44
4a1qa31000 or more people20
9QATestLab2501-1000 people17
8BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
1ScienceSoft2501-1000 people85
2QA Madness251-200 people44
9QATestLab2501-1000 people17
8BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
2QA Madness251-200 people44
4a1qa31000 or more people20
6QAble451-200 people8
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
1ScienceSoft2501-1000 people85
3QASource11000 or more people29
4a1qa31000 or more people20
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
3QASource11000 or more people29
9QATestLab2501-1000 people17
10PFLB551-200 people6
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
9QATestLab2501-1000 people17
Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
9QATestLab2501-1000 people17
Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.
8BetterQA4Not published11-50 people0
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
11Lotus Quality AssuranceNot publishedNot published201-500 people9
12Testrig TechnologiesNot published51-200 people7
13iBeta Quality Assurance151-200 people4
14TestbytesNot published51-200 people0

What changed since

  • Entered the list since this snapshot: digi-test-lab, qavalue, qytera, coderio, pointwest.
  • Left the list since this snapshot: none.
  • Changed position: PFLB from 10 to 13, Lotus Quality Assurance from 11 to 15, Testrig Technologies from 12 to 16, iBeta Quality Assurance from 13 to 17, Testbytes from 14 to 19.

Every change of composition and order between versions is recorded in the changelog.

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.