If a company lists Apache JMeter among its tools, does that mean it has a published number to show for a load test, such as a latency or throughput figure?

No, the tool entry by itself does not carry a measured result. This page's Performance engineering tag requires a case study reporting a throughput or latency figure, a stricter bar than simply naming a tool. Case studies of any kind, not only load-testing ones, are on record for twelve of the nineteen companies here. Naming Apache JMeter only confirms that a company has worked with the tool; it does not confirm that a client ever saw a published number from a run using it.

Since Apache JMeter costs nothing to license, does naming it in a company's tool list mean that company has built real load-testing capability around it?

No, it says nothing about capability on its own. Apache JMeter is free and open-source, so listing it commits a company to no purchase, unlike naming a commercial performance-testing product with a per-seat license. A verified certificate is a closer signal of investment, since it comes from a third-party audit, and only two of the nineteen companies on this page carry one. A free tool in a company's list and a demonstrated load-testing practice around it are two different claims, and this page records only the first.

If a company's profile shows an hourly rate for Apache JMeter work, does that rate include the infrastructure needed to actually run the load test?

The published fields do not say. A load test needs infrastructure beyond the tool itself, such as load generators and an environment close to production, and this page has no field showing whether that cost is billed separately or bundled into the rate. Fifteen of the nineteen companies here publish an hourly rate, and that figure is the only price signal on record for any of them. A buyer needs to ask what the quoted rate covers before treating it as the full cost of a load-testing engagement.

Does a company using Apache JMeter run load tests once before a big release, or as a routine step on every deployment?

The tool entry does not distinguish between the two. A single pre-launch check and a load test wired into every release both use the same tool and would show up the same way in a profile. Engagement models are stated by fifteen of the nineteen companies here, and a dedicated-team or project-based label describes how work is structured; it says nothing about how often a load test runs. Whether JMeter appears once before a launch or on every deploy is a scheduling detail this page does not record.

Best Apache JMeter QA companies in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

19 testing companies in this catalog list Apache JMeter among the frameworks and tools they work with. They are grouped below by what each is best suited for, in 9 groups. 2 of them hold a certificate confirmed by a register entry and 15 publish a rate card. Composition and order last changed on September 6, 2026.

19 companies. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies

Apache JMeter: 19 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#	Company	Case studies	Published rates	Team size	Reviews
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
1	ScienceSoft	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	85
2	QA Madness	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	44
3	QASource	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	29
4	a1qa	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	20
5	OnPath Testing	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	11-50 people	17
6	QAble	4	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	8
7	Frugal Testing	1	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	7
8	BetterQA	4	Not published	11-50 people	0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1	ScienceSoft	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	85
2	QA Madness	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	44
4	a1qa	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	20
9	QATestLab	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
10	Digi Test Lab	Not published	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	11-50 people	5
8	BetterQA	4	Not published	11-50 people	0
11	QAValue	Not published	Blended $100-149/hclutch.co	11-50 people	0
12	Qytera Quality GmbH	7	Not published	11-50 people	0
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
2	QA Madness	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	44
3	QASource	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	29
4	a1qa	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	20
6	QAble	4	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	8
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
3	QASource	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	29
9	QATestLab	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
13	PFLB	5	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	51-200 people	6
12	Qytera Quality GmbH	7	Not published	11-50 people	0
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
1	ScienceSoft	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	85
2	QA Madness	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	44
9	QATestLab	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
8	BetterQA	4	Not published	11-50 people	0
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
1	ScienceSoft	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	85
3	QASource	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	29
4	a1qa	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1000 or more people	20
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
9	QATestLab	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
9	QATestLab	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.
8	BetterQA	4	Not published	11-50 people	0
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
14	Coderio	Not published	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	10
15	Lotus Quality Assurance	Not published	Not published	201-500 people	9
16	Testrig Technologies	Not published	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	7
17	iBeta Quality Assurance	1	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	51-200 people	4
18	Pointwest	Not published	Not published	51-200 people	0
19	Testbytes	Not published	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	0

Where the two largest tag groups overlap

Automation first and Nearshore for the EU each cover eight companies on this page, by criteria that have nothing to do with each other: one turns on automation testing sold as a service with a case study behind it, the other on where a company delivers work. Four companies clear both: ScienceSoft, QA Madness, a1qa and BetterQA. QASource, OnPath Testing, QAble and Frugal Testing clear Automation first without an EU-adjacent delivery location. QATestLab, Digi Test Lab, QAValue and Qytera Quality GmbH clear Nearshore for the EU without the automation-testing case study the other tag needs.

One tag that sits entirely inside another

Security focus, on this page, names four companies: ScienceSoft, QA Madness, QATestLab and BetterQA. All four also carry the Nearshore for the EU tag. Nothing in the criterion behind Security focus refers to delivery location, so the full overlap is a fact about who happens to qualify here, not a rule built into either tag. The same pattern shows up between Embedded team model and Automation first: all four companies with the Embedded team model tag, QA Madness, QASource, a1qa and QAble, also carry Automation first, again without one criterion referring to the other.

The company behind both single-member tags

Device lab coverage and Fast onboarding each name exactly one company on this page, and it is the same company in both cases: QATestLab. QATestLab also carries Performance engineering and Security focus, for four tags in addition to Nearshore for the EU, five in total. Counting every company's tags on this page, no other company reaches more than four, a count shared by ScienceSoft, QA Madness, QASource, a1qa and BetterQA. A third single-member tag, Regulated industries, names a different company, BetterQA, which needs at least two verified certificates from a set of four named standards. QATestLab's two single-member tags rest on a device lab total and an onboarding time instead, criteria that do not involve certificates at all.

Performance engineering split by delivery footprint

Four companies carry the Performance engineering tag: QASource, QATestLab, PFLB and Qytera Quality GmbH. Within this group of four, delivery location sorts them three ways. QASource also carries Nearshore for the USA. QATestLab and Qytera also carry Nearshore for the EU. PFLB carries neither nearshore tag, which places its published delivery locations outside both of the country lists those two tags read. A tag built on a service and a case study does not automatically bring a geography tag with it, and PFLB is the company on this page where that gap is visible.

Six companies outside every tag on this page

Coderio, Lotus Quality Assurance, Testrig Technologies, iBeta Quality Assurance, Pointwest and Testbytes carry none of the nine tags used on this page. Sitting outside every tag means that no published, sourced fact matched a tag's criterion for these companies at the time of the check. It is not evidence that the underlying service is missing: a tag depends on what a company has published and a source has confirmed, and a capability that is real but unpublished cannot earn one.

How this ranking was put together

Membership is computed from the profile, not chosen: companies appear here when they list Apache JMeter among the frameworks and tools they work with, as their own profile states. Position in a ranking cannot be bought. Paid options are limited to the extended profile, labelled sponsor slots and lead forms, and none of them affect tags or order.

The table compares the fields that decide this axis: case studies, published rates, team size, plus the number of verified reviews on external platforms. Rates, minimum project size and onboarding time carry the source they came from next to the value.

Automation first: Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
Nearshore for the EU: At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
Embedded team model: The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
Performance engineering: Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
Security focus: Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
Nearshore for the USA: At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
Device lab coverage: A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
Fast onboarding: A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
Regulated industries: At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.

The criteria for this axis are on the methodology page, together with field definitions and the rule for editorial order. Changes of order are recorded in the changelog.

Questions

If a company lists Apache JMeter among its tools, does that mean it has a published number to show for a load test, such as a latency or throughput figure?: No, the tool entry by itself does not carry a measured result. This page's Performance engineering tag requires a case study reporting a throughput or latency figure, a stricter bar than simply naming a tool. Case studies of any kind, not only load-testing ones, are on record for twelve of the nineteen companies here. Naming Apache JMeter only confirms that a company has worked with the tool; it does not confirm that a client ever saw a published number from a run using it.
Since Apache JMeter costs nothing to license, does naming it in a company's tool list mean that company has built real load-testing capability around it?: No, it says nothing about capability on its own. Apache JMeter is free and open-source, so listing it commits a company to no purchase, unlike naming a commercial performance-testing product with a per-seat license. A verified certificate is a closer signal of investment, since it comes from a third-party audit, and only two of the nineteen companies on this page carry one. A free tool in a company's list and a demonstrated load-testing practice around it are two different claims, and this page records only the first.
If a company's profile shows an hourly rate for Apache JMeter work, does that rate include the infrastructure needed to actually run the load test?: The published fields do not say. A load test needs infrastructure beyond the tool itself, such as load generators and an environment close to production, and this page has no field showing whether that cost is billed separately or bundled into the rate. Fifteen of the nineteen companies here publish an hourly rate, and that figure is the only price signal on record for any of them. A buyer needs to ask what the quoted rate covers before treating it as the full cost of a load-testing engagement.
Does a company using Apache JMeter run load tests once before a big release, or as a routine step on every deployment?: The tool entry does not distinguish between the two. A single pre-launch check and a load test wired into every release both use the same tool and would show up the same way in a profile. Engagement models are stated by fifteen of the nineteen companies here, and a dedicated-team or project-based label describes how work is structured; it says nothing about how often a load test runs. Whether JMeter appears once before a launch or on every deploy is a scheduling detail this page does not record.

Previous versions

Each year is frozen as it stood when the snapshot was taken, with the field values recorded at that date. This page always shows the current version.

The 2026 list: 14 companies, taken 2026-09-03. 5 entered and 0 left since.

Other axes these companies appear on

Type of testing: Test automation 17 of these 19 companies also stand there
Industry: Ecommerce 16 of these 19 companies also stand there
Industry: Healthcare 16 of these 19 companies also stand there
Type of testing: Performance testing 16 of these 19 companies also stand there

How to choose a vendor on this axis

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 5, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.