Does an external reviews count of zero mean the same thing as no reviews field at all?

No, and this list has both cases. 23 of the 66 companies have no external reviews field filled in at all. 40 of the 66 have at least one verified review on an external platform on record. The remaining 3 have the field filled, a platform on record, with a review count of zero, which is a different fact from having no field.

Can we take the automated test suite with us if we switch vendors later?

A written contract should state who owns the test code and the page-object layer under it, because an automated suite is a deliverable that has to keep executing after the team that wrote it leaves: the next team needs the same framework version, the same runner and the same locator strategy the original authors picked, and none of that survives a handover by itself. 49 of the 66 companies on this list name at least one framework in their profile, which is the only published clue to whether a suite would be written against a runner other teams already know or against a wrapper the vendor maintains itself. The other 17 list test automation as a service without naming the framework behind it. A suite handed over as a repository the client's own pipeline can run is a different deliverable from one that executes only where the vendor set it up, and no field on this page separates the two.

Who is responsible for fixing a test that starts failing on and off after the automation suite is delivered?

A flaky test, one that fails and then passes on the same code with nothing changed in between, creates ongoing maintenance work that a one-time build fee does not usually cover. Whether that work falls to the vendor or lands back on the client's own team depends on the engagement model attached to the contract, and 48 of the 66 companies on this list publish at least one engagement model in their profile, while 18 name none. A published model is only a starting point for that conversation, since none of the models listed here specify test maintenance as a line item, and a model name in a profile does not say which side absorbs that recurring work once the suite is running in production.

How can we verify that an automated suite will actually shorten the time a regression run takes in CI before we sign a contract?

A case study is the main public evidence most companies on this list can point to for a change in run time, since none of them publish a general benchmark that would apply across projects. 45 of the 66 companies publish at least one case study, and 21 publish none, so for those 21 a claim about a faster regression run has no supporting document behind it on this page. Even where a case study exists, its numbers describe one client's codebase and one starting point, and a run time figure from a different project does not transfer automatically to a new one. A number from a past project should be checked against the client's own current baseline before it is used to size a new engagement.

Best Test automation companies in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

66 testing companies in this catalog list Test automation among their services. They are grouped below by what each is best suited for, in 11 groups. 9 of them hold a certificate confirmed by a register entry and 40 publish a rate card. Composition and order last changed on September 6, 2026.

66 companies. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies

Test automation: 66 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#	Company	Frameworks	Case studies	Published rates	Reviews
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
1	ScienceSoft	Selenium, Appium, REST Assured, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	85
2	QA Wolf	Playwright, Appium	3	Not published	65
3	DeviQA	Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, k6	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
4	QA Madness	Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, WebdriverIO, k6, Apache JMeter	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
5	QualityLogic	Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Katalon, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Playwright	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	37
6	QASource	Salesforce, Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Apache JMeter, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	29
7	BugRaptors	Selenium, WebdriverIO, Cypress, Playwright	2	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	26
8	Abstracta	Appium, Gatling	4	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	24
9	Luxe Quality	Salesforce, Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Cucumber, WebdriverIO, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Postman, SoapUI, REST Assured	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	21
10	QAlified	Postman, SoapUI	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	21
11	a1qa	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Apache JMeter, Postman, Cucumber, k6, REST Assured, TestComplete, Katalon, SoapUI	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	20
12	OnPath Testing	Selenium, Cypress, Postman, Cucumber, Apache JMeter	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	17
13	QAwerk	Selenium, Robot Framework, Appium, TestNG, JUnit	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	13
14	QAble	Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Appium, WebdriverIO, k6, Apache JMeter, Gatling, Postman, REST Assured	4	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	8
15	Savarian.tech	Selenium, pytest, Playwright, Postman	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	8
16	Frugal Testing	Microsoft Dynamics 365, ServiceNow, Selenium, TestNG, Apache JMeter	1	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	7
17	Moolya	Selenium	4	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	7
18	SHIFT ASIA	Not published	3	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	7
19	Sofka Technologies	Tricentis Tosca	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	7
20	Codoid	Selenium	2	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	5
21	Software Testing Bureau	Not published	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1
22	2i	Oracle applications, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, Workday	3	Not published	0
23	andagon people GmbH	Tricentis Tosca, Robot Framework, Postman	4	Blended $100-149/hclutch.co	0
24	appmatics GmbH	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Appium, Postman, Robot Framework, TestNG, k6	7	Not published	0
25	BetterQA	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Jest, pytest, k6, Apache JMeter, Postman, REST Assured	4	Not published	0
26	Critical Software	Not published	4	Not published	0
27	ImpactQA	Oracle applications, SAP, Tricentis Tosca	5	Not published	0
28	QualityAI	Not published	2	Not published	0
29	QualityKiosk Technologies	Katalon	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	0
30	Testhouse	Tricentis Tosca, Katalon, ServiceNow	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	0
31	Yethi Consulting	Not published	3	Not published	0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1	ScienceSoft	Selenium, Appium, REST Assured, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	85
3	DeviQA	Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, k6	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
4	QA Madness	Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, WebdriverIO, k6, Apache JMeter	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
32	Applause	Not published	3	Not published	39
33	TestFort	SAP, Selenium, Appium	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	32
34	UNGUESS	Not published	1	Not published	27
9	Luxe Quality	Salesforce, Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Cucumber, WebdriverIO, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Postman, SoapUI, REST Assured	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	21
11	a1qa	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Apache JMeter, Postman, Cucumber, k6, REST Assured, TestComplete, Katalon, SoapUI	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	20
35	QATestLab	Salesforce, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	17
36	White Test Lab	Not published	Not published	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	14
13	QAwerk	Selenium, Robot Framework, Appium, TestNG, JUnit	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	13
15	Savarian.tech	Selenium, pytest, Playwright, Postman	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	8
37	AskYourQA	Selenium, Playwright, Appium, Espresso, Cypress	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	7
38	QA Mentor	Selenium	Not published	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	7
20	Codoid	Selenium	2	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	5
39	Digi Test Lab	SoapUI, Selenium, Postman, Apache JMeter, Gatling	Not published	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	5
40	Soflab Technology	SAP, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	3
23	andagon people GmbH	Tricentis Tosca, Robot Framework, Postman	4	Blended $100-149/hclutch.co	0
24	appmatics GmbH	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Appium, Postman, Robot Framework, TestNG, k6	7	Not published	0
25	BetterQA	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Jest, pytest, k6, Apache JMeter, Postman, REST Assured	4	Not published	0
26	Critical Software	Not published	4	Not published	0
41	imbus AG	SAP, Robot Framework	Not published	Not published	0
42	MTP	Not published	Not published	Not published	0
43	QAValue	Appium, Cucumber, Apache JMeter, Selenium	Not published	Blended $100-149/hclutch.co	0
44	QualityMinds	Not published	1	Not published	0
45	Qytera Quality GmbH	Playwright, Selenium, Robot Framework, Apache JMeter, Postman, Cypress	7	Not published	0
46	SQA Service	Robot Framework, Playwright, Cucumber	7	Not published	0
47	TSOFT	Tricentis Tosca	Not published	Not published	0
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
1	ScienceSoft	Selenium, Appium, REST Assured, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	85
6	QASource	Salesforce, Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Apache JMeter, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	29
8	Abstracta	Appium, Gatling	4	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	24
10	QAlified	Postman, SoapUI	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	21
11	a1qa	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Apache JMeter, Postman, Cucumber, k6, REST Assured, TestComplete, Katalon, SoapUI	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	20
48	ILoveMyQA	Cypress, Selenium, WebdriverIO, Cucumber, Playwright, Postman, Appium	Not published	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	11
19	Sofka Technologies	Tricentis Tosca	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	7
21	Software Testing Bureau	Not published	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	1
41	imbus AG	SAP, Robot Framework	Not published	Not published	0
42	MTP	Not published	Not published	Not published	0
49	PLATO	Not published	1	Not published	0
46	SQA Service	Robot Framework, Playwright, Cucumber	7	Not published	0
50	TestLauncher	Not published	1	Not published	0
47	TSOFT	Tricentis Tosca	Not published	Not published	0
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
2	QA Wolf	Playwright, Appium	3	Not published	65
3	DeviQA	Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, k6	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
4	QA Madness	Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, WebdriverIO, k6, Apache JMeter	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
33	TestFort	SAP, Selenium, Appium	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	32
6	QASource	Salesforce, Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Apache JMeter, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	29
11	a1qa	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Apache JMeter, Postman, Cucumber, k6, REST Assured, TestComplete, Katalon, SoapUI	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	20
13	QAwerk	Selenium, Robot Framework, Appium, TestNG, JUnit	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	13
14	QAble	Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Appium, WebdriverIO, k6, Apache JMeter, Gatling, Postman, REST Assured	4	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	8
22	2i	Oracle applications, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, Workday	3	Not published	0
24	appmatics GmbH	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Appium, Postman, Robot Framework, TestNG, k6	7	Not published	0
27	ImpactQA	Oracle applications, SAP, Tricentis Tosca	5	Not published	0
28	QualityAI	Not published	2	Not published	0
44	QualityMinds	Not published	1	Not published	0
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
5	QualityLogic	Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Katalon, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Playwright	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	37
33	TestFort	SAP, Selenium, Appium	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	32
6	QASource	Salesforce, Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Apache JMeter, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	29
7	BugRaptors	Selenium, WebdriverIO, Cypress, Playwright	2	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	26
8	Abstracta	Appium, Gatling	4	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	24
35	QATestLab	Salesforce, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	17
18	SHIFT ASIA	Not published	3	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	7
40	Soflab Technology	SAP, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	3
45	Qytera Quality GmbH	Playwright, Selenium, Robot Framework, Apache JMeter, Postman, Cypress	7	Not published	0
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
1	ScienceSoft	Selenium, Appium, REST Assured, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	85
3	DeviQA	Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, k6	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
4	QA Madness	Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, WebdriverIO, k6, Apache JMeter	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
35	QATestLab	Salesforce, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	17
13	QAwerk	Selenium, Robot Framework, Appium, TestNG, JUnit	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	13
18	SHIFT ASIA	Not published	3	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	7
25	BetterQA	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Jest, pytest, k6, Apache JMeter, Postman, REST Assured	4	Not published	0
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
3	DeviQA	Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, k6	5	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	44
5	QualityLogic	Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Katalon, TestComplete, Appium, Espresso, XCUITest, Playwright	3	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	37
35	QATestLab	Salesforce, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	17
51	PLUS QA	pytest, TestNG, JUnit, Selenium, Appium, Postman	Not published	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	8
Accessibility specialists Accessibility testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports an accessibility conformance metric.
52	Vervali Systems	Not published	1	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	11
49	PLATO	Not published	1	Not published	0
Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
32	Applause	Not published	3	Not published	39
34	UNGUESS	Not published	1	Not published	27
Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
35	QATestLab	Salesforce, Selenium, Appium, Robot Framework, TestComplete, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, Postman	2	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	17
53	CHEQ Systems	Selenium, Cypress, Appium, TestNG	Not published	Not published	0
Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.
25	BetterQA	Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Appium, Jest, pytest, k6, Apache JMeter, Postman, REST Assured	4	Not published	0
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
54	Indium Software	Salesforce	1	Not published	21
55	Q-Pros	Not published	Not published	Blended from $300/hclutch.co	20
56	Kualitatem	Not published	Not published	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	9
57	Lotus Quality Assurance	Selenium, Cypress, Appium, SoapUI, Apache JMeter	Not published	Not published	9
58	Testrig Technologies	Salesforce, Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon, Appium, TestComplete, Robot Framework, REST Assured, Postman, Apache JMeter, SoapUI, k6, Cucumber	Not published	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	7
59	Testriq QA Lab	SAP, Selenium, Appium	Not published	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	6
60	iBeta Quality Assurance	Selenium, Appium, Playwright, Robot Framework, Cypress, Apache JMeter	1	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	4
61	AGEST Vietnam	Not published	Not published	Not published	0
62	Pointwest	Tricentis Tosca, Selenium, Apache JMeter	Not published	Not published	0
63	QualiZeal	SAP, Tricentis Tosca	Not published	Not published	0
64	Testbytes	Selenium, Apache JMeter, Appium	Not published	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	0
65	TestVagrant	Selenium, Appium	Not published	Not published	0
66	Zoonou	Not published	Not published	Not published	0

What "test automation" means in this table

Every company on this page lists test automation as a service it sells; that is the qualifying fact for this axis. The Automation first tag asks for more than that listing, and 31 of the 66 companies meet the fuller bar. For the other 35 the service is on the site and the number that would back it is not.

Nearshore delivery splits the list two ways, headquarters does not

Two tags on this page describe delivery geography. Nearshore for the EU applies to 28 of the 66 companies and Nearshore for the USA to 14 of the 66, and only 6 companies carry both. That leaves 30 of the 66 carrying exactly one of the two tags and 30 carrying neither, so a delivery footprint that covers both regions is the exception on this list rather than the shape most companies here have.

Headquarters is a separate field, and it does not track the Nearshore for the USA tag the way it might look at first glance. 16 of the 66 companies are headquartered in the United States, two more than carry the Nearshore for the USA tag, but only 4 companies sit in both groups at once. Twelve US-headquartered companies on this list have no delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America on record, and ten companies with the Nearshore for the USA tag are headquartered somewhere other than the United States. The two totals sit close to each other while the overlap between the groups stays small, which is evidence that the two fields do not move together.

A second discipline alongside automation

Thirteen of the 66 companies carry the Embedded team model tag, a commitment recorded in two fields at once rather than in the service list alone.

Two tags mark a second discipline published alongside automation. Performance engineering applies to 9 of the 66 companies, and 5 of those 9 also meet the Automation first bar, leaving 4 that publish a throughput or latency metric without a matching automation case study. Security focus applies to 7 of the 66, and 6 of those 7 also meet the Automation first bar, leaving 1 that does not. The overlap is high in both directions, and the companies outside it publish the metric for one discipline and not for the other.

The narrowest tags on this page

Five of the eleven tags on this page apply to 4 companies or fewer, and each rests on one published number specific to that tag. Device lab coverage applies to DeviQA, QualityLogic, QATestLab and PLUS QA. Accessibility specialists applies to Vervali Systems and PLATO. Crowdtesting at scale applies to Applause and UNGUESS. Fast onboarding applies to QATestLab again and to CHEQ Systems. Regulated industries applies to BetterQA alone. Four of these five groups have no company in common with each other; QATestLab is the one company that appears in two of them.

A verified certificate of any kind is recorded for only 9 of the 66 companies on this page. That scarcity is part of why Regulated industries stays at one company: the certificate pool it draws two from is already narrow before the two-certificate condition is applied.

How this ranking was put together

Membership is computed from the profile, not chosen: companies appear here when they list Test automation among their services, as their own profile states. Position in a ranking cannot be bought. Paid options are limited to the extended profile, labelled sponsor slots and lead forms, and none of them affect tags or order.

The table compares the fields that decide this axis: frameworks, case studies, published rates, plus the number of verified reviews on external platforms. Rates, minimum project size and onboarding time carry the source they came from next to the value.

Automation first: Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
Nearshore for the EU: At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
Nearshore for the USA: At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
Embedded team model: The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
Performance engineering: Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
Security focus: Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
Device lab coverage: A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
Accessibility specialists: Accessibility testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports an accessibility conformance metric.
Crowdtesting at scale: The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
Fast onboarding: A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
Regulated industries: At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.

The criteria for this axis are on the methodology page, together with field definitions and the rule for editorial order. Changes of order are recorded in the changelog.

Questions

Does an external reviews count of zero mean the same thing as no reviews field at all?: No, and this list has both cases. 23 of the 66 companies have no external reviews field filled in at all. 40 of the 66 have at least one verified review on an external platform on record. The remaining 3 have the field filled, a platform on record, with a review count of zero, which is a different fact from having no field.
Can we take the automated test suite with us if we switch vendors later?: A written contract should state who owns the test code and the page-object layer under it, because an automated suite is a deliverable that has to keep executing after the team that wrote it leaves: the next team needs the same framework version, the same runner and the same locator strategy the original authors picked, and none of that survives a handover by itself. 49 of the 66 companies on this list name at least one framework in their profile, which is the only published clue to whether a suite would be written against a runner other teams already know or against a wrapper the vendor maintains itself. The other 17 list test automation as a service without naming the framework behind it. A suite handed over as a repository the client's own pipeline can run is a different deliverable from one that executes only where the vendor set it up, and no field on this page separates the two.
Who is responsible for fixing a test that starts failing on and off after the automation suite is delivered?: A flaky test, one that fails and then passes on the same code with nothing changed in between, creates ongoing maintenance work that a one-time build fee does not usually cover. Whether that work falls to the vendor or lands back on the client's own team depends on the engagement model attached to the contract, and 48 of the 66 companies on this list publish at least one engagement model in their profile, while 18 name none. A published model is only a starting point for that conversation, since none of the models listed here specify test maintenance as a line item, and a model name in a profile does not say which side absorbs that recurring work once the suite is running in production.
How can we verify that an automated suite will actually shorten the time a regression run takes in CI before we sign a contract?: A case study is the main public evidence most companies on this list can point to for a change in run time, since none of them publish a general benchmark that would apply across projects. 45 of the 66 companies publish at least one case study, and 21 publish none, so for those 21 a claim about a faster regression run has no supporting document behind it on this page. Even where a case study exists, its numbers describe one client's codebase and one starting point, and a run time figure from a different project does not transfer automatically to a new one. A number from a past project should be checked against the client's own current baseline before it is used to size a new engagement.

Previous versions

Each year is frozen as it stood when the snapshot was taken, with the field values recorded at that date. This page always shows the current version.

The 2026 list: 45 companies, taken 2026-09-03. 21 entered and 0 left since.

Other axes these companies appear on

Industry: Ecommerce 49 of these 66 companies also stand there
Industry: Banking 47 of these 66 companies also stand there
Industry: Healthcare 46 of these 66 companies also stand there
Delivery location: Europe 38 of these 66 companies also stand there

How to choose a vendor on this axis

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 5, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.