Best QA companies in Europe, 2026
QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.
The companies
| # | Company | Delivery locations | Published rates | Team size | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 2 | Testlio | the USA, Estonia |
| 51-200 people | 76 |
| 3 | Global App Testing | the UK, Romania | Not published | 51-200 people | 66 |
| 4 | Edgescan | Ireland, the USA | Not published | 51-200 people | 53 |
| 5 | DeviQA | Poland |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 6 | QA Madness | Poland |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 7 | Berezha Security Group | Ukraine, Poland |
| 11-50 people | 40 |
| 8 | BreachLock | the USA, the UK, the Netherlands, India | Not published | 51-200 people | 40 |
| 9 | Applause | the USA, Germany, Israel, Poland, India | Not published | 201-500 people | 39 |
| 10 | TestFort | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 11 | UNGUESS | Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK | Not published | 51-200 people | 27 |
| 12 | Sekurno | Estonia, the Netherlands |
| 11-50 people | 26 |
| 13 | Luxe Quality | the USA, Spain, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 21 |
| 14 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 15 | Iterasec | Ukraine, Poland, Romania |
| 11-50 people | 19 |
| 16 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 17 | White Test Lab | Ukraine |
| 11-50 people | 14 |
| 18 | QAwerk | Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 19 | SnoopGame | Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines |
| 51-200 people | 9 |
| 20 | Savarian.tech | Poland, the UAE, Ukraine, Ireland, Sweden |
| 11-50 people | 8 |
| 21 | AskYourQA | Romania |
| 1-10 people | 7 |
| 22 | QA Mentor | the USA, the UK, France, Ukraine, Israel, Thailand, Romania, Tunisia, India |
| 201-500 people | 7 |
| 23 | Codoid | India, the USA, Singapore, Norway |
| 51-200 people | 5 |
| 24 | Digi Test Lab | Romania |
| 11-50 people | 5 |
| 25 | Soflab Technology | Poland |
| 51-200 people | 3 |
| 26 | Beta Family | Sweden | Not published | 1-10 people | 2 |
| 27 | PlaytestCloud | Germany | Not published | 201-500 people | 2 |
| 28 | andagon people GmbH | Germany |
| 51-200 people | 0 |
| 29 | appmatics GmbH | Germany | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 30 | BetterQA | Romania | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 31 | Bit Sentinel | Romania | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 32 | Blaze Information Security | Portugal | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 33 | Char49 | Portugal | Not published | 1-10 people | 0 |
| 34 | Cobalt | the USA, Germany, the UK | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 35 | Cossack Labs | Ukraine, the UK | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 36 | Critical Software | Portugal, the UK, Germany, the USA | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 37 | Devoteam Cyber Trust | Portugal | Not published | Not published | 0 |
| 38 | Ethiack | Portugal | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 39 | Euro-Testing Software Solutions | Romania | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 40 | GlobalStep | the USA, Canada, the UK, Romania, Spain, France, Portugal, India | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 41 | ILUNION Accesibilidad | Spain | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 42 | imbus AG | Germany, Kosovo, Canada | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 43 | Internet Security Auditors | Spain, Colombia | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 44 | MTP | Spain, Mexico, Brazil | Not published | 501-1000 people | 0 |
| 45 | QAValue | Portugal, the Netherlands |
| 11-50 people | 0 |
| 46 | QualityMinds | Germany, Poland | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 47 | Qytera Quality GmbH | Germany | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 48 | Redsauce | Spain | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 49 | S21sec | Spain, Portugal | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 50 | sepp.med gmbh | Germany | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 51 | Side | the UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, Brazil | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 52 | SQA Service | Bulgaria, Romania, Argentina | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 53 | Tarlogic Security | Spain | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 54 | Testronic | the UK, Poland, the USA, the Philippines, Romania, Serbia | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 55 | TSOFT | Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Peru, Spain, Colombia, Uruguay | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 56 | VisionWare | Portugal | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 57 | Zerolynx | Spain | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 5 | DeviQA | Poland |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 6 | QA Madness | Poland |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 58 | BugRaptors | India, the USA, the UK, Australia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 26 |
| 59 | Abstracta | the USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 13 | Luxe Quality | the USA, Spain, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 21 |
| 14 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 18 | QAwerk | Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 20 | Savarian.tech | Poland, the UAE, Ukraine, Ireland, Sweden |
| 11-50 people | 8 |
| 23 | Codoid | India, the USA, Singapore, Norway |
| 51-200 people | 5 |
| 60 | 2i | the UK, India | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 28 | andagon people GmbH | Germany |
| 51-200 people | 0 |
| 29 | appmatics GmbH | Germany | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 30 | BetterQA | Romania | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 36 | Critical Software | Portugal, the UK, Germany, the USA | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 61 | ImpactQA | the USA, the UK, India | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 62 | QualityAI | the UK | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 63 | Testhouse | the UK, the USA, Australia, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, India |
| 501-1000 people | 0 |
| Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 2 | Testlio | the USA, Estonia |
| 51-200 people | 76 |
| 5 | DeviQA | Poland |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 6 | QA Madness | Poland |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 10 | TestFort | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 14 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 18 | QAwerk | Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 19 | SnoopGame | Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines |
| 51-200 people | 9 |
| 60 | 2i | the UK, India | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| 29 | appmatics GmbH | Germany | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 61 | ImpactQA | the USA, the UK, India | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 62 | QualityAI | the UK | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 46 | QualityMinds | Germany, Poland | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 59 | Abstracta | the USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 14 | a1qa | the USA, the UK, Poland, Georgia, Bangladesh, Mexico |
| 1000 or more people | 20 |
| 64 | NetSPI | the USA, Canada, the UK, India | Not published | 501-1000 people | 11 |
| 19 | SnoopGame | Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines |
| 51-200 people | 9 |
| 40 | GlobalStep | the USA, Canada, the UK, Romania, Spain, France, Portugal, India | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 42 | imbus AG | Germany, Kosovo, Canada | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 43 | Internet Security Auditors | Spain, Colombia | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 44 | MTP | Spain, Mexico, Brazil | Not published | 501-1000 people | 0 |
| 51 | Side | the UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, Brazil | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| 52 | SQA Service | Bulgaria, Romania, Argentina | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 55 | TSOFT | Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Peru, Spain, Colombia, Uruguay | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study. | |||||
| 1 | ScienceSoft | the USA, Mexico, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 85 |
| 4 | Edgescan | Ireland, the USA | Not published | 51-200 people | 53 |
| 5 | DeviQA | Poland |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 6 | QA Madness | Poland |
| 51-200 people | 44 |
| 16 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 18 | QAwerk | Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 13 |
| 64 | NetSPI | the USA, Canada, the UK, India | Not published | 501-1000 people | 11 |
| 30 | BetterQA | Romania | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| 65 | Bishop Fox | the USA, the UK | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| 34 | Cobalt | the USA, Germany, the UK | Not published | 201-500 people | 0 |
| Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric. | |||||
| 10 | TestFort | the UK, the USA, Ukraine |
| 51-200 people | 32 |
| 58 | BugRaptors | India, the USA, the UK, Australia, the UAE |
| 501-1000 people | 26 |
| 59 | Abstracta | the USA, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Canada, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 24 |
| 16 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 66 | PFLB | the USA, the UK |
| 51-200 people | 6 |
| 25 | Soflab Technology | Poland |
| 51-200 people | 3 |
| 47 | Qytera Quality GmbH | Germany | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Crowdtesting at scale The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source. | |||||
| 3 | Global App Testing | the UK, Romania | Not published | 51-200 people | 66 |
| 9 | Applause | the USA, Germany, Israel, Poland, India | Not published | 201-500 people | 39 |
| 11 | UNGUESS | Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK | Not published | 51-200 people | 27 |
| 26 | Beta Family | Sweden | Not published | 1-10 people | 2 |
| 67 | Digivante | the UK | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source. | |||||
| 5 | DeviQA | Poland |
| 201-500 people | 44 |
| 16 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| 19 | SnoopGame | Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines |
| 51-200 people | 9 |
| 68 | iXie Gaming | the USA, India, the UK, Singapore |
| 501-1000 people | 3 |
| Accessibility specialists Accessibility testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports an accessibility conformance metric. | |||||
| 41 | ILUNION Accesibilidad | Spain | Not published | 51-200 people | 0 |
| Enterprises A verified ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 certificate, a published team size of 201-500 or larger, and at least one named client that is a publicly traded company, each with a source. A company that publishes no team size does not carry this tag. | |||||
| 51 | Side | the UK, the USA, Canada, India, Japan, Portugal, Brazil | Not published | 1000 or more people | 0 |
| Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source. | |||||
| 16 | QATestLab | Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK |
| 501-1000 people | 17 |
| Regulated industries At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001. | |||||
| 30 | BetterQA | Romania | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
| Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles. | |||||
| 69 | Indium Software | India, the USA, the UK, Singapore, Australia, Japan | Not published | 1000 or more people | 21 |
| 70 | Kualitatem | the USA, the UK, Pakistan, the UAE |
| 51-200 people | 9 |
| 71 | Testrig Technologies | India, the UK, the USA |
| 51-200 people | 7 |
| 72 | Zoonou | the UK | Not published | 11-50 people | 0 |
What a delivery location in Europe covers
72 companies appear on this page because each one records at least one delivery location in Europe. The geography axis is built from delivery locations, the places where a company's testers and engineers actually work, not from the country of a company's registered headquarters. A company can keep its headquarters anywhere in the world and still qualify for this page through a European delivery location alone, and a headquarters address inside Europe does not by itself place a company here unless a delivery location is separately recorded for it.
This produces headquarters addresses spread across more countries than the continent itself. The 72 companies on this page are headquartered across 17 countries. The United States accounts for 16 of them, more than any other single country in this set, and the United Kingdom follows with 10. Germany and Spain each account for 7, Portugal for 6, and Poland and Romania each account for 5. The remaining 16 companies are spread across 10 other headquarters countries: India accounts for 4, Ukraine for 3, Estonia for 2, and seven further countries record a single company each. None of these headquarters figures describes where any of the 72 companies deliver testing work; that detail is confirmed on each company's own profile.
The Nearshore for the EU tag is narrower than the axis
57 of the 72 companies on this page also carry the Nearshore for the EU tag, whose criterion checks a delivery location against a specific, shorter list of countries: the EU, the EEA, Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia and Moldova. The remaining 15 companies qualify for this page through a European delivery location that sits outside that shorter list. The axis and the tag answer different questions as a result: the axis confirms a delivery location somewhere in Europe, and the tag confirms one inside a defined subset of it.
How applicability tags concentrate across the page
Of the 72 companies on this page, 4 carry no applicability tag, 29 carry exactly one, 27 carry exactly two, 4 carry exactly three, 6 carry exactly four, and 2 carry five, the most held by any company here.
DeviQA and QATestLab are the two five-tag companies. Both carry Security focus, Device lab coverage and Nearshore for the EU. DeviQA completes its set with Embedded team model and Automation first, while QATestLab completes its set with Performance engineering and Fast onboarding.
6 companies carry four tags each, among them ScienceSoft and a1qa.
Four tags on this page go to exactly one company each: Fast onboarding to QATestLab, Accessibility specialists to ILUNION Accesibilidad, Enterprises to Side, and Regulated industries to BetterQA. None of these four companies holds more than one of these four tags, so each qualifies through a distinct set of published facts.
Four companies on this page carry no applicability tag at all: Indium Software, Kualitatem, Testrig Technologies and Zoonou. A European delivery location is still recorded for each of them; the applicability tags describe additional, separately verified claims, and their absence does not remove a company from this axis.
What a European delivery location leaves open
A delivery location in Europe settles nothing about the evidence published elsewhere on a company's profile. At least one case study is recorded for 44 of the 72 companies here. Among the other fields checked on this page, named clients carry no published answer for 19 of the 72, industries for 9, frameworks for 40, client stages for 47, engagement models for 24, and certificates for 54. Of these six fields, certificates carries the widest gap and industries the narrowest. None of these gaps tracks which applicability tags a company carries: a company can hold several tags and still leave its certificate field or its client list unpublished, because these fields sit outside the conditions that produce the tags.
How this ranking was put together
Membership is computed from the profile, not chosen: companies appear here when they have a delivery location in one of the countries Europe covers, as their own profile states. Position in a ranking cannot be bought. Paid options are limited to the extended profile, labelled sponsor slots and lead forms, and none of them affect tags or order.
The table compares the fields that decide this axis: delivery locations, published rates, team size, plus the number of verified reviews on external platforms. Rates, minimum project size and onboarding time carry the source they came from next to the value.
- Nearshore for the EU: At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
- Automation first: Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
- Embedded team model: The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
- Nearshore for the USA: At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
- Security focus: Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
- Performance engineering: Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
- Crowdtesting at scale: The crowdtesting engagement model is offered, and a published tester pool of 10,000 people or more, with a source.
- Device lab coverage: A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
- Accessibility specialists: Accessibility testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports an accessibility conformance metric.
- Enterprises: A verified ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 certificate, a published team size of 201-500 or larger, and at least one named client that is a publicly traded company, each with a source. A company that publishes no team size does not carry this tag.
- Fast onboarding: A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
- Regulated industries: At least two verified certificates from ISO 13485, HITRUST CSF, PCI QSA and ISO/IEC 27001.
The criteria for this axis are on the methodology page, together with field definitions and the rule for editorial order. Changes of order are recorded in the changelog.
Questions
- Can we get a price by seniority before the first call, or only one number for the whole team?
- Only one number, for the whole team. Every rate published in this composition is a single blended figure, and none of them breaks down by seniority, though the schema behind the catalog holds junior, middle, senior and lead figures as well. Among the 29 companies that publish a rate at all, the blended figure spans a wide band: 6 quote below 25 USD an hour, 14 quote between 25 and 49 USD, 7 quote between 50 and 99 USD, and 2 quote between 100 and 149 USD. A quote at either end of that range carries no seniority mix with it.
- One vendor shows a CREST accreditation and another an ISO/IEC 27001 certificate. What does each one actually prove?
- CREST accreditation confirms that a penetration testing or security operations service has been accredited by CREST and listed in its member marketplace, a narrower claim than an ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, which confirms an information security management system certified by an accredited body across the company. Among the certified companies here, CREST is the most common mark at nine, ahead of ISO/IEC 27001 at seven, ISO 9001 at four, TMMi at two and ISO 13485 at one. One company holds three certificates at once; the other seventeen hold one or two, and each mark proves only the scope named in its own definition.
- Our data has to stay inside the EU. Does a European delivery location mean the work happens only there?
- Not on its own. 34 of the 72 companies record at least one delivery location outside Europe alongside the European one, and 38 record delivery inside Europe only. Within Europe the footprint is usually a single country: 47 companies record one, 14 record two, 4 record three, 3 record four and 4 record five, the widest count here. The UK accounts for the most delivery locations at 28, ahead of Poland at 13, Romania at 12, Ukraine at 11 and Germany at 11, out of 21 European countries recorded in all. The field says where a company's teams sit, not which of those sites would staff a given contract.
Previous versions
Each year is frozen as it stood when the snapshot was taken, with the field values recorded at that date. This page always shows the current version.
- The 2026 list: 43 companies, taken 2026-09-03. 29 entered and 0 left since.
Other axes these companies appear on
- Delivery proximity: nearshore for a buyer in the EU 57 of these 72 companies also stand there
- Industry: Healthcare 46 of these 72 companies also stand there
- Industry: Banking 43 of these 72 companies also stand there
- Industry: Ecommerce 42 of these 72 companies also stand there
Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 3, 2026
Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.