QA Rating

Best Tricentis Tosca QA companies in 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

10 testing companies in this catalog list Tricentis Tosca among the frameworks and tools they work with. They are grouped below by what each is best suited for, in 5 groups. 0 of them hold a certificate confirmed by a register entry and 5 publish a rate card. Composition and order last changed on September 6, 2026.
10 companies. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies

Tricentis Tosca: 10 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#CompanyCase studiesPublished ratesTeam sizeReviews
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
1Sofka Technologies1501-1000 people7
2andagon people GmbH451-200 people0
3ImpactQA5Not published201-500 people0
4Testhouse2501-1000 people0
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
5Soflab Technology151-200 people3
2andagon people GmbH451-200 people0
6Euro-Testing Software SolutionsNot publishedNot published51-200 people0
7TSOFTNot publishedNot published1000 or more people0
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
1Sofka Technologies1501-1000 people7
7TSOFTNot publishedNot published1000 or more people0
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
3ImpactQA5Not published201-500 people0
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
5Soflab Technology151-200 people3
Other companies in this axis No applicability tag met its criterion for these profiles.
8Testrig TechnologiesNot published51-200 people7
9PointwestNot publishedNot published51-200 people0
10QualiZealNot publishedNot published1000 or more people0

Two nearshore tags meet in exactly one company

Nearshore for the EU names four companies in this composition: Soflab Technology, andagon people GmbH, Euro-Testing Software Solutions and TSOFT. Nearshore for the USA names two: Sofka Technologies and TSOFT. TSOFT is the only company that carries both nearshore tags on this page. Soflab Technology, andagon people GmbH and Euro-Testing Software Solutions carry Nearshore for the EU without also carrying Nearshore for the USA. Sofka Technologies carries Nearshore for the USA without Nearshore for the EU.

Automation first's three pairings, and the member with none

Automation first names four companies: Sofka Technologies, andagon people GmbH, ImpactQA and Testhouse. Three of the four also carry a second tag on this page, and each pairs with a different one. Sofka Technologies pairs Automation first with Nearshore for the USA. andagon people GmbH pairs Automation first with Nearshore for the EU. ImpactQA pairs Automation first with Embedded team model. Testhouse carries Automation first alone, with no second tag in this composition. No company in this composition carries more than two of the five tags used on this page.

Embedded team model and Performance engineering name different partners

Embedded team model names exactly one company on this page, ImpactQA, already named above as an Automation first member. Performance engineering also names exactly one company, Soflab Technology, already named above as a Nearshore for the EU member. Each of these single-member tags sits beside a different second tag: Embedded team model beside Automation first, Performance engineering beside Nearshore for the EU.

A case study on record outside the Automation first group

Five companies in this composition have at least one published case study on record. Four of the five are the Automation first members already named: Sofka Technologies, andagon people GmbH, ImpactQA and Testhouse. The fifth, Soflab Technology, publishes a case study of its own. Soflab Technology's tag on this page is Performance engineering.

No tag on this page, and one shared headquarters country

Testrig Technologies, Pointwest and QualiZeal carry none of the five tags used on this page. Across all ten companies in this composition, headquarters countries repeat only once: ImpactQA and QualiZeal both list the US. The other eight companies each list a headquarters country distinct from every other company here.

How this ranking was put together

Membership is computed from the profile, not chosen: companies appear here when they list Tricentis Tosca among the frameworks and tools they work with, as their own profile states. Position in a ranking cannot be bought. Paid options are limited to the extended profile, labelled sponsor slots and lead forms, and none of them affect tags or order.

The table compares the fields that decide this axis: case studies, published rates, team size, plus the number of verified reviews on external platforms. Rates, minimum project size and onboarding time carry the source they came from next to the value.

  • Automation first: Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
  • Nearshore for the EU: At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
  • Nearshore for the USA: At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
  • Embedded team model: The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
  • Performance engineering: Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.

The criteria for this axis are on the methodology page, together with field definitions and the rule for editorial order. Changes of order are recorded in the changelog.

Questions

How many of the companies working with Tosca in this ranking publish an hourly rate?
Five of the ten companies in this Tosca ranking publish a blended hourly rate, and five leave the rate field blank. The published bands range from under 25 USD per hour to 100-149 USD per hour, with no single band covering more than two companies. A blended rate covers labor time for the engagement, and it is a separate figure from any license Tricentis charges for the product itself. None of the ten companies here has a certificate verified on record, so for most of them a rate band is the only cost-related field published at all.
If a company is listed as working with Tosca, does that mean its rate already includes a Tricentis license?
Tosca is commercial software, and its license is purchased from Tricentis as a transaction separate from any testing services contract; a company's presence in this ranking confirms it has offered work with the tool rather than that its price already includes a subscription. None of the fields tracked in this ranking records whether a quoted rate or a case study assumes a license is already in place, so that detail comes only from the vendor directly. A company's blended hourly rate, where published, describes labor time, not a license fee. Licensing for Tosca works differently from an open-source framework, where no separate purchase or vendor confirmation is needed at all.
Can a Tosca test suite built by one vendor be handed to a different testing company that doesn't use Tosca?
A Tosca test case is designed inside the product's own model rather than written as source code in a general-purpose language, so it cannot be opened in an ordinary code editor without the product installed. Moving the work to a company that does not use Tosca means designing the test cases again in whichever tool that team standardizes on. External reviews are on record for three of the ten companies in this ranking, and a favorable review of a company's testing service says nothing about whether its Tosca models would transfer to a different tool. A buyer changing vendors mid-project can expect the existing suite to need a redesign, since the models do not carry over into another tool's format.
If a company lists Tosca as a tool it works with, does that mean most of its testers are certified or experienced in it?
Listing Tosca in a company's tool set records that the company has offered work with the product; it does not state how many staff are proficient in it or on how many projects it was used. Named clients are on record for seven of the ten companies in this ranking, but naming a client does not describe what portion of that work involved Tosca specifically. Engagement models are on record for eight of the ten companies here, and an engagement model describes how the work is structured rather than how deep the team's Tosca expertise runs. Proficiency with Tosca is also a narrower skill than proficiency with an open-source framework, because the software itself, and the training to use it, come only through a paid license from Tricentis.

Other axes these companies appear on

How to choose a vendor on this axis

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 5, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.