Among the 11 companies on this page, what minimum project size figures are on record, and how many companies report each?

3 of the 11 companies on this page report a minimum project size of 1,000 USD. 4 of the 11 companies report 5,000 USD. 3 of the 11 companies report 10,000 USD. The remaining 1 company on this page has no minimum project size on record.

Our EU customers' personal data would sit in test environments. Does a nearshore label settle where that data gets processed?

No. The nearshore tag records how close a delivery site sits to the client's region, and its criterion admits Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia and Moldova alongside EU and EEA countries, so a company can carry it while delivering from outside the EU entirely. That leaves the transfer arrangement as a separate question from the tag: personal data moving from an EU controller to a site in Ukraine needs one, and the same data moving to a site inside an EU member state does not. The field that would record a signed data processing agreement is empty for all 11 companies on this page, so nothing recorded here answers it either way.

If work has to keep running when one site is unavailable, does a profile show whether a vendor can deliver from anywhere else?

Partly. The delivery location field holds every country a company has confirmed, so a vendor that also runs work elsewhere shows more than one entry, and one company here qualifies for a second nearshore tag on the strength of a delivery site in a different region. What the field does not carry is how work is divided between those sites, or which of them a given project would be staffed from. A continuity arrangement is a term of the contract, and the catalog records the sites a company confirmed, never the plan for moving work between them.

Does a published hourly range say what an engagement delivered from Ukraine would cost?

It says what the company charges, which stops being the same question once that company delivers from more than one country. A rate is recorded once per company, and no separate figure is held per delivery site, so a published range covers the vendor's work as a whole. Three of the recorded ranges sit under 25 USD an hour, six in the 25 to 49 band and one in 50 to 99. Which site a quoted figure was built around is something only the quote itself states.

Best QA companies in Ukraine, 2026

QA Rating is published independently, and its publisher owns no company listed in this catalog.

11 testing companies in this catalog have a delivery location in one of the countries Ukraine covers. They are grouped below by what each is best suited for, in 8 groups. 1 of them holds a certificate confirmed by a register entry and 10 publish a rate card. Composition and order last changed on September 3, 2026.

11 companies. Ordered by the number of verified reviews on external platforms, highest first. Companies with an equal count are ordered by name.

The companies

Ukraine: 11 companies, grouped by what they are best suited for.
#	Company	Delivery locations	Published rates	Team size	Reviews
Nearshore for the EU At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
1	Berezha Security Group	Ukraine, Poland	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	11-50 people	40
2	TestFort	the UK, the USA, Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	32
3	Luxe Quality	the USA, Spain, Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	21
4	Iterasec	Ukraine, Poland, Romania	Blended $50-99/hclutch.co	11-50 people	19
5	QATestLab	Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
6	White Test Lab	Ukraine	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	11-50 people	14
7	QAwerk	Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	13
8	SnoopGame	Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	9
9	Savarian.tech	Poland, the UAE, Ukraine, Ireland, Sweden	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	11-50 people	8
10	QA Mentor	the USA, the UK, France, Ukraine, Israel, Thailand, Romania, Tunisia, India	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	201-500 people	7
11	Cossack Labs	Ukraine, the UK	Not published	11-50 people	0
Automation first Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
3	Luxe Quality	the USA, Spain, Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	21
7	QAwerk	Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	13
9	Savarian.tech	Poland, the UAE, Ukraine, Ireland, Sweden	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	11-50 people	8
Embedded team model The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
2	TestFort	the UK, the USA, Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	32
7	QAwerk	Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	13
8	SnoopGame	Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	9
Device lab coverage A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
5	QATestLab	Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
8	SnoopGame	Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	9
Performance engineering Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
2	TestFort	the UK, the USA, Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	32
5	QATestLab	Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
Security focus Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
5	QATestLab	Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
7	QAwerk	Ukraine	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	51-200 people	13
Fast onboarding A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
5	QATestLab	Cyprus, France, Poland, Ukraine, the UK	Blended $25-49/hclutch.co	501-1000 people	17
Nearshore for the USA At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.
8	SnoopGame	Estonia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, North Macedonia, Mexico, the Philippines	Blended up to $25/hclutch.co	51-200 people	9

How a Ukraine delivery location differs from a Ukraine headquarters

The geography axis on this page groups companies by a confirmed delivery location in Ukraine, a field that records where a company runs testing work. Headquarters is a separate field: it records where a company is registered, and it plays no part in qualifying a company for this page. Of the 11 companies with a confirmed Ukraine delivery location, 3 also record a Ukraine headquarters. The remaining 8 record a headquarters in one of five other countries. Three of those five countries account for two companies each, and the remaining two countries account for one company each. A buyer whose requirement is a Ukraine-registered legal entity should check the headquarters field on a company profile directly, since the two fields vary independently across the 11 companies on this page.

Five companies with no tag beyond Nearshore for the EU

All 11 companies on this page carry the Nearshore for the EU tag, since a confirmed delivery location in Ukraine sits within the region this tag covers. For 5 of the 11, that shared tag is the only applicability tag recorded on this page: Berezha Security Group, Iterasec, White Test Lab, QA Mentor and Cossack Labs each carry Nearshore for the EU and no other tag tracked on this page. The remaining 6 companies each carry at least one additional tag, detailed below.

Automation first and Embedded team model

Automation first holds 3 companies: Luxe Quality, QAwerk and Savarian.tech. Embedded team model holds a different set of 3: TestFort, QAwerk and SnoopGame. QAwerk is the only company on this page that carries both tags. Luxe Quality and Savarian.tech carry Automation first without Embedded team model. TestFort and SnoopGame carry Embedded team model without Automation first.

Device lab coverage, Performance engineering and the tags QATestLab alone carries

Device lab coverage holds 2 companies: QATestLab and SnoopGame, already named above. Performance engineering also holds 2 companies: TestFort, already named above, and QATestLab. QATestLab is the only company on this page that carries both Device lab coverage and Performance engineering. Security focus holds 2 companies, QATestLab and QAwerk, both already named above. Fast onboarding holds a single company, QATestLab. QATestLab is the one company on this page carrying four tags at once in addition to Nearshore for the EU: Fast onboarding, Device lab coverage, Performance engineering and Security focus.

What a buyer in the United States is choosing on this page

The nearshore condition aimed at US buyers reads for a delivery site in the Americas, and a Ukrainian site is not one, so for a company that delivers from here that label sits out of reach by construction rather than by shortfall. What a US buyer gets in its place is a working day that opens before theirs and closes around the middle of it. That arrangement shapes a relationship more than any label does: a question raised late in a US afternoon is answered before the next US morning, and a question raised late in the Ukrainian day waits a full cycle. Vendors used to working that way write handover notes and leave the next step stated; vendors used to a shared afternoon expect a call. No field on a profile records which habit a company has, and asking how the working day was divided on a previous engagement across these time zones settles it faster than any tag on the page.

The widest and the narrowest gaps among the eleven profiles

Beyond the applicability tags, nine further profile fields show a gap in this composition between companies with a published, sourced answer and companies with none. A confirmed certificate is recorded for 1 of the 11 companies, leaving 10 with none confirmed by a source. An hourly rate range appears on 10 of the 11 profiles; the field is empty for the remaining 1. At least one published case study appears on 8 of the 11 profiles, leaving 3 with none. An external review count from a named platform appears on 10 of the 11 profiles, leaving 1 with none. Named clients are unfilled for 2 of the 11. Engagement models are unfilled for 4 of the 11. Frameworks and client stages are each unfilled for 5 of the 11. Signs a BAA / GDPR DPA carries a wider gap than any other field in this list, unfilled for all 11 companies. Published rates and external reviews are tied for the smallest gap in this list, each unfilled for only 1 of the 11 companies. An unfilled field records the absence of a published, sourced answer, not a negative claim that a company declined to provide one.

How this ranking was put together

Membership is computed from the profile, not chosen: companies appear here when they have a delivery location in one of the countries Ukraine covers, as their own profile states. Position in a ranking cannot be bought. Paid options are limited to the extended profile, labelled sponsor slots and lead forms, and none of them affect tags or order.

The table compares the fields that decide this axis: delivery locations, published rates, team size, plus the number of verified reviews on external platforms. Rates, minimum project size and onboarding time carry the source they came from next to the value.

Nearshore for the EU: At least one delivery location in the EU or the EEA, or in Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia or Moldova.
Automation first: Test automation is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a coverage or regression time metric.
Embedded team model: The dedicated team engagement model is offered, and at least one published case study.
Device lab coverage: A published device lab of 100 real devices or more, with a source.
Performance engineering: Performance testing is offered as a service, and at least one published case study reports a throughput or latency metric.
Security focus: Security testing is offered, together with either penetration testing or a verified ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and at least one published case study.
Fast onboarding: A published onboarding time of 14 days or less, with a source.
Nearshore for the USA: At least one delivery location in Canada, Mexico, Central America or South America.

The criteria for this axis are on the methodology page, together with field definitions and the rule for editorial order. Changes of order are recorded in the changelog.

Questions

Among the 11 companies on this page, what minimum project size figures are on record, and how many companies report each?: 3 of the 11 companies on this page report a minimum project size of 1,000 USD. 4 of the 11 companies report 5,000 USD. 3 of the 11 companies report 10,000 USD. The remaining 1 company on this page has no minimum project size on record.
Our EU customers' personal data would sit in test environments. Does a nearshore label settle where that data gets processed?: No. The nearshore tag records how close a delivery site sits to the client's region, and its criterion admits Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia and Moldova alongside EU and EEA countries, so a company can carry it while delivering from outside the EU entirely. That leaves the transfer arrangement as a separate question from the tag: personal data moving from an EU controller to a site in Ukraine needs one, and the same data moving to a site inside an EU member state does not. The field that would record a signed data processing agreement is empty for all 11 companies on this page, so nothing recorded here answers it either way.
If work has to keep running when one site is unavailable, does a profile show whether a vendor can deliver from anywhere else?: Partly. The delivery location field holds every country a company has confirmed, so a vendor that also runs work elsewhere shows more than one entry, and one company here qualifies for a second nearshore tag on the strength of a delivery site in a different region. What the field does not carry is how work is divided between those sites, or which of them a given project would be staffed from. A continuity arrangement is a term of the contract, and the catalog records the sites a company confirmed, never the plan for moving work between them.
Does a published hourly range say what an engagement delivered from Ukraine would cost?: It says what the company charges, which stops being the same question once that company delivers from more than one country. A rate is recorded once per company, and no separate figure is held per delivery site, so a published range covers the vendor's work as a whole. Three of the recorded ranges sit under 25 USD an hour, six in the 25 to 49 band and one in 50 to 99. Which site a quoted figure was built around is something only the quote itself states.

Other axes these companies appear on

Delivery proximity: nearshore for a buyer in the EU 11 of these 11 companies also stand there
Industry: Ecommerce 9 of these 11 companies also stand there
Industry: Healthcare 9 of these 11 companies also stand there
Type of testing: Manual testing 8 of these 11 companies also stand there

How to choose a vendor on this axis

Published by QA RatingPublished on September 3, 2026Updated on September 5, 2026

Every fact about a company comes from a listed source. A field without a source stays empty. A certificate counts as confirmed only when a registry, certificate or auditor report backs it; a certificate the company only claims about itself is published separately, under that label. Vendors can request a correction at hello@qa-rating.com. A correction is applied when it comes with a public source.